Search results

are there any differences between intake manifold from 19 16v and Clio ph.1 16v? i didnt manage to find any info re. this...

THANKS NICK! so these seem to be a tiny bit too much? even when accompanied with some head work, proprely tuned software?

ok to be more specific - please , what do you think about that thing? please - no one knows? partnr duration@0.1mm timing@0.1mm max.lift (mm) lift@TDC (mm) clearance (mm) duration@0.050" timing@0.050" max. lift (inch) lift@TDC (inch)...

does cup reach 62mph on 2nd? and 60?

does cup reach 62mph on 2nd? and 60?

please can anyone scan and post/send wiring scheme? ive been tinking about fitting fan switch, but its really hard to find something in what is called engine bay, esp. when you dont know where to look...

OK - what to expect, is it worth it, what should the upgrade be helped with. (a chip of course...?) here is what catcams offer to F7P/R : range SPORT... http://www.catcams.be/renault/PN55022xx.htmhttp://www.catcams.be/renault/PN55022xx.htm I want to stay hydro, and a want cam that would...

""A higher octane fuel should allow you to advance the ignition closer to MBT, and hence more torque, so more power."" of course ur right, but remeber - higher octane fuel has less power ...little less calories...

so... again, cos i didn;t really get it... basic version (the cheapest ?) of the upgrade will result in engine consisting of: original F7P + bare 2.0 litre block (from F7R only? or maybe sthg else too?) + crank from F7R (willy / mailto:meg@150">meg@150) or from 1.9 diesel + pistons with...

i really almost fell of the chair, when i first saw this site, and monsters from the "tuned"...

i really almost fell of the chair, when i first saw this site, and monsters from the "tuned"...

heh you have seat height adj. ? its not ph1, is it?

its polish server heeeh :)

what is good on continent is that you actually sit opposite to the engine and it means really nice weight distr. ;) prob better than ahem... yours ;)

heh you have seat height adj. ? its not ph1, is it?

its polish server heeeh :)

""Well its an interesting idea if youre after a super short box from a later Clio"" well its just an idea, not even mine... someone posted it at one of polish forums... pointing that it would be a lot of fun having such an item between engine and wheels :) (between the lines you could read...

its funny - when i saw that depressed grim after "consumption - going down" i thought - wait something is wrong. you should be happy... but then it came up that you measure it differently :) heh... i guess its all of us who suffer this. my valver swallows up to 15 liters for 100km in...

its funny - when i saw that depressed grim after "consumption - going down" i thought - wait something is wrong. you should be happy... but then it came up that you measure it differently :) heh... i guess its all of us who suffer this. my valver swallows up to 15 liters for 100km in...

wow.. thats low :) its on its knees and begs for some nice wheels... ;)

wow.. thats low :) its on its knees and begs for some nice wheels... ;)

hehe... now im even more confused.. but i will not look for volvo box :)... thx anyway sorry for putting a stupid questions but its often hard to find an answer looking through the posts

just want to know - has anyone fitted a non-clio I gearbox ? i heard that boxes even from alguna 1.8 16v will fit, but not perfect to the engine and need changing the left mount? same with 19 16v? how about a Clio 2 1.6 16v box? - it;s said to fit either, again- some problem with a gap...

he already said it - susp. performs better...

"Moving a few pounds off the flywheel is one thing, doing the same to the wheels is another" i never insisted that removing 2 kgs per wheel will make your car go madly quicker. but removing weight from wheels is closer to shaving flywheel than to removing carpet in your boot :) and like...

AFAIK wheel consists of a rim and a tyre :)... re article: WTF!?... lol? but seeing "coulthards chin as movable aerodynamic aid..." it all becomes really sensible :) anyway what are such articles written for? its not even funny trying desperately to be...

AFAIK wheel consists of a rim and a tyre :)... re article: WTF!?... lol? but seeing "coulthards chin as movable aerodynamic aid..." it all becomes really sensible :) anyway what are such articles written for? its not even funny trying desperately to be...

disagree with you slarty... it does matter :) rotational weight is more important to acceleration than the mass of any other points... its like orlando said... "He has tryed it and says it is better to get a lighter weel, than a lighter car (in the same proportion, off course)" you should...

did end up nice this topic... reasonable... :) thanks. was sometimes funny to read it (as someone said - good to a popcorn... had an interesting plot)... but had some sense overall... :) maciek

oh boy oh boy what did I do... should have stayed quiet and keep my thoughts for myself :) myself im somewhere inbetween your counteropinions... ...it may work, but not always, it is not so easy, so it has to be properly and carefully constructed - meaning trying not to spoil intake...