Search results

Not complicated at all, injectors are very simple, just take your time and make sure you pay attention to where everything went, and make sure it goes back there. Hardest part is removing & refitting the lower due to the inaccessibility of a few of the bolts, the upper is dead easy. Oh and you...

haha no it doesn't at all mate! Probably another company also called JMS! :cool:

No mate, never been to a EA meet although I should. Live in west London these days (were we are based) and drive a black 182.

Should really make an appearance, especially as I was born near Fakenham and my olds still live that way :)

Just leave them be mate. They will do what it says on the tin end of, and for how long... who knows... but for that price does it even matter. No one should start hassling K-tec or any other company for that matter, they don't need to justify anything. They are not a charity and re-branding...

this. Some of the cams we have been working with lift the torque figure from as low as 3k by 15+ lb/ft, and then the peak figure by around 5-6 lb/ft. What that gives you is a very quick car with excellent power delivery. No need to chase the limiter to screw every ounce of go from the car.

opps. They will have replaced the oil. You wouldn't have got 100 meters down the road without it. Its just made its way out since.

Lamba sensor won't make a blind bit of difference to a 'tapping' engine. Sounds suspiciously like oil starvation to me, IIRC your old engine was a gonna due to low oil yes? I would check the dipstick if I was you. DP pulley is also a likely cause.

Yeah, they have been a bit thin on the ground over christmas as we have all been away etc, but they are back in full swing now and Mr Stone my partner (not that type) always sends out reminder PMs. You usually get to see some interesting clio tuning bits and bobs too that we are developing on...

Not that simple, there is a fuel cut off feature that inhibits fueling once you lift off the throttle, no amount of timing can really get round this.

UBW relevant in here? Still searching for answers baby!

flol

Your thinking of Will Jon, one of our regulars :)

more than likely on our way to get some silicon bends ;) How are the coilovers mate?

Stop influencing him. His cups a corker. The saxo will be a failure in contrast. FACT

^ agreed.

A freakishly fast 182, I don't doubt that figure for a minute, I think you should let us try some bits on it see what she can really do ;)

Ollie choose somewhere nice, within 45mins of me & I'll be there :)

Our 182: JMS & Fastchip Calibration JMS Induction Setup (race filter) JMS & APD Matched inlet manifold Straight through silenced de-cat

haha, name some places....

^ I like your style ;)

Perfection. Credit to you.

AFR is measured at the exhaust on these runs, its measurement below 3k can be basically ignored as it does not have the means to take accurate measurements.

Maybe we can have less of a WWII reenactment, and actually have 4-5 a side!

Done.

Sure mate, always enjoyed working with your car as it is one of the most potent basically modified PH2s we know of!

I wondered if that could have been an issue... you had almost exactly the same result as car where the solenoid had packed up on the same rollers last year.

Good result, looses seem a little high, 156 ATW would usually equate to nearly 190 ATF (but that's the joy of ATF figures, everyone calculates them differently :dapprove:) Either way that engine WILL wake up as you get the miles on it. I saw a 200 yesterday get 192 which is about right. 200 is...

That is a good figure for a near standard car with the usual modification, but not with that sort of work done....

Are you the lad with the MK1 with a 172 ph1 engine?