Search results

Guys, GDI, YozzaSport, AngelWorks, etc etc are having us all on - 200bhp out of the F4R is easy!! All you need is K+N (+10bhp) and a Superchip (+20bhp). lol...

http://www.fonefunshop.co.uk/forum/index.php?

Not sure on the wide arches - looka a bit after market. Yellow one looks ace as ever. lol.

Less soundproofing, seats, spare, thinner glass all round, air con, engine cover, wheels,..... er..... few other bits, but not sure what...

Interesting that neil. Often wondered why the RS1 were seemingly so light, yet have all the extra bits...

Cup. Obviously there will be exceptions. Probably similar pwr/weight but Cup has better gearing and suspension which should enable it to get to power down better. Only based on what 1/4 mile times I've seen on here. No doubt on the road there wouldn't be a great deal in it.

looks slow to me, and sounds a bit... dunno. Laboured??!! I'm on me laptop though, which has a button for a speaker.

Aye, the Renaultsport variants were "metallic pearlescent supergloss" or something like that iirc.

I'm pretty sure they do the standard Clio in Monaco Blue too. So the only individual colour to the phase 2 172 is Iceburg Silver.

Xbox 360 youth.

10/10 for originality :)

;)

A539's :eek:

You think not?? What? It's not brilliant work or it's not cheap?

Brilliant work. And cheap as chips too!! You'll be making a loss Ben if you keep doing it at that price!! :clown:

The spoilers are 99% cosmetic. I have a Cup splitter, Cup Spoiler and Cup turinis giving me the wider track. I can't say I've noticed any difference in stability. lol. Surely a small brained pleb like you can appreciate that weight will also aid stabilty? When you had a 172 it was the best...

Fuckining hell, I wish I'd got a pound for everytime this has been posted. They all do it. It's to meet strict emissions on cold start up. They run a bit lean.

Doesn't do anything for me. Evey car I've seen on black wheels looks like its got the old black steelies on when moving. A nice bright silver wheels would have looked better imho.

Hence why they can only afford old bangers. ;)

Nope. You? Just giving my opinion, same as you.

Yup. Also Williams owners are complete tossers and 172 owners are not. The car is special. You are not. ;) Performance wise very similar. bhp/ton identical. Trouble is there are very few standard examples left, so it's difficult to compare the two.

I've never noticed any. I use predominanyl Optimax, but when I used standard 95 for a few weeks it made no difference whatsoever. I only use optimax for the supposed engine cleaners in it.

God you talk shite. The chances are the 172 would be more stable, having more weight. And lol @ bigger spoiler. Must make some serious downforce. lol.

Wait until the cold weather comes. On average one a week, and that's only what gets posted on here. Fantastic cars, but dangerous in the hands of an unexperienced driver. £250 a month on insurance!! you must be mad!!! :eek: :eek:

I would take the money you were going to spend on those doors and spend it on the engine. Should see you 200bhp and a dollop of torque

Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo (repeat to fade)

I removed mine when I fitted my ITG and there is a definite loss of low down torque.

The cup steering wheel does have an airbag.

I have a 3gp video of my 172 doing something similar, but can't get it to wok on putfile. :(

Pah... excuses excuses... lol I found out that my K750i wedges perfectly in my steering wheel, making speedo vids a doddle. lol