172 against a cup the facts!!! ;-)

[clidge]

hi everyone i am pretty new to the forum and i have heard about the cup and it being lightweight without some of the toys that are in a standard 172 but i just wondered on the road what are the figures 0-60 0-100 etc etc many thanks i am not trying to stir anything i just wondered...what is the weight difference between the two as well cos i am getting light weight 15's and have taken the spare off but i am also a fatbastard!!!!!!!! ;-)))))

 

[Griff]

http://www.cliosport.net/index.php?pid=14

http://www.cliosport.net/index.php?pid=15

For specs ^^^

I've got a Cup and owned a mk2 172 before. Cup is "marginally" faster but no doubt someone will be along soon to tell you all about how the Williams is the best thing since sliced bread and argue you should have bought one of those in the first place

 

[Martin_172]

thing with the renault engines is not every 172 makes the 172bhp or ps or what ever it is so you will get full fats that are faster than cups and cups that are faster than full fats etc (same driver, conditions etc)

so its all down to driver really

 

[Gareth]

.2 of a second, ffs.

 

[Rob669]

Off we go again...

 

[richy]

http://www.cliosport.net/index.php?pid=14

http://www.cliosport.net/index.php?pid=15

For specs ^^^

I've got a Cup and owned a mk2 172 before. Cup is "marginally" faster but no doubt someone will be along soon to tell you all about how the Williams is the best thing since sliced bread and argue you should have bought one of those in the first place

the williams is the best thing since sliced bread, u should have bought one of those instead