This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
So is there any discernable difference between 172 and 182 power? Anyone confident they could sit (metaphorically) blindfold in either car and be able to tell the difference in delivery? I have a 172 and always rue those 10 missing horses....
The 182 seem to loose some low end power compaired to the 172 IMO. But that might be due to milage the 172 usualy have more miles on them whih means more power anyway.
I had a mk2 172 from new for just over 4 years with 48k on the clock when i sold it in February this year . Bought a new 182 in Feb and to be honest the 172 was quicker , probably because of the mileage difference . The 182 only has 2700 miles on the clock so far , so is far from being loose .
ahh and onto spare wheels - any foolhardy 172'ers dumped the spare wheel for a can of foam like those 182'ers? I tried to use the standard jack the other day and it's awful - I was pretty sure that on a dark rainy night broken down on a camber with a flat you might just aswell not bother having either the spare or the jack at all and enjoy the weight saving the rest of the time! Haven't had the courage of my convictions yet tho!
Glad i made the upgrade to the ff 182 with cup packs though from the ff 172 . It handles hell of alot better , better suspension and the exaltos stick like sh*t to the proverbial blanket