I did chuck a bucket of water over it before we left MattLooked like a brilliant day out had by all Tony The old RB was looking rather good as well!!
Cheers
M
car looks fantastic, whoever prep'd it must be good
Its not been on TV yet rofl
thought the 182 would have done better? 200 really that good then?1+ second slower REALY!!
i think the 182 cup was meant to be faster round a track than the trophy, so the new 200 must be the ultimate track clio IMO.
as Tony said "i know the "real" result"
Which track is the 182 Cup faster than a Trophy? Are you refering to EVO's 182 Cup lap time at Bedford?
A factor to consider like I said when watching it is the 182 is well run in and the 200 will only have a few miles on it and everybody seems to comment on how mileage makes the F4R engine come alive and loosen up.
iphone ftlWould have got more information if I'd have shoved my fingers up my arse.
What a crock of sh*t fitch gear is.
what a poor article on 200 v 182 that 5th gear produced. hardly worth the watch at all. compare topgear rs focus v megane r26r! shame on 5th gear!
what a poor article on 200 v 182 that 5th gear produced. hardly worth the watch at all. compare topgear rs focus v megane r26r! shame on 5th gear!
as Tony said "i know the "real" result"
maybe / maybe not...but from an independent television channel / programme, I would at least expect a fair review / test rather than fiddling things for renault's and / or view consumption. if it was a fix...then that is even more disgraceful of 5th gear!If you owned Renault would you have an old car beat your new one?
A factor to consider like I said when watching it is the 182 is well run in and the 200 will only have a few miles on it and everybody seems to comment on how mileage makes the F4R engine come alive and loosen up.
If you owned Renault would you have an old car beat your new one?