Geometry figures - look ok?

[dave_rudabar]

Have got a 2002 172, just had the tracking checked & adjusted at my usual tyre place. They changed the toe-angle, and the car is much more neutral now, was a bit lively up front before.
The photo shows the results (based on V6 clio settings, only just realised this - are they similar?)

What might cause the camber to be off like this? There's no signs of it being in an accident, and it's on original standard suspension.

If they should've used a different setting for a regular road car, i'd like to know - then I can get them to change it when i go back next month.

 

[Fred@BTM]

looks like way too much toe!

 

[dave_rudabar]

Now that it's 2degrees each side? I couldn't find figures on here, but I figured it'd end up 0degrees TBH.
Or before, being -1.75 & -0.25 ?

 

[Fred@BTM]

2degrees toe is HUGE, that must drive crap!

 

[dave_rudabar]

It seemed a lot duller, but i only drove it 1mile home!
What's standard & got any ideas about the difference in camber figures?

 

[dave_rudabar]

Yep, driven a bit more today, definitely a duller steering feel & the wheel is slightly off centre too - can anyone give me the standard 172 settings?