just imagine how much bigger a gash is on a 42" screen !!!!
you need a pc there you go sorted oh then some software to make a nice front end if you like that sort of thing
and a tv tuner if you want to watch/record tv on it thats all
specs really are just depending on what you want to process on it if you want 1080p you need a semi decent pc
id recommend 2gig ram
dual core cpu of some description and a graphics card with dvi output (depends on your tv tho ) if you could get one that did support hdcp aswell it could help with hd dvd and bluray playing from the pc
oh and s**tloads of storage 1 TB should be a starter
its only in his bedroom in a shared house so he wont have huge space (this is unless he has moved )
you dont need all that to play 1080p at all dont be silly a 1080p ts file at about 25mbs upto the full 35 will run fine on a core 2 duo with a half decent graphics card even a mac mini can decode 1080p not the solo one tho
depending on your tv and dvd player it may very well give you better video quality but you will most prob have to live with under/over scan unless your tv supports 1-1 pixel mapping
the beauty of a htpc is that it upscales everything to the resolution that your displaying at.
it will also give you alot of storage for ripped dvd's downloaded films, music and a handy way to access it all oh and you can record tv
thats about it they are good but unless you really need it they cost alot for not much use
depending on your tv and dvd player it may very well give you better video quality but you will most prob have to live with under/over scan unless your tv supports 1-1 pixel mapping
the beauty of a htpc is that it upscales everything to the resolution that your displaying at.
it will also give you alot of storage for ripped dvd's downloaded films, music and a handy way to access it all oh and you can record tv
thats about it they are good but unless you really need it they cost alot for not much use
There's also the issue that 99.99% of 'HD' displays, including LCDs and Plasmas, are only 1024x768 panels. Only the 5k Pioneer job is a true 1920 pixels wide.
lots of irrelevant pictures
oh and hd source material is all over the place so he would have lots to decode
he wants to stick a dvd in his pc and for him to hit play and for it to be displayed on his tv (thats decoding) i dont see a mention of him connecting up a very high end sony camcorder to create hd movies ?
morning!
wondering if anyone can help me, I've just bought a 32" samsung tv and I now want to get surround sound / dvd / hard drive / hd etc...
what do I buy and why!!!
patty
lots of irrelevant pictures
My TV will show a 1920x1080 resolution as well, but what I'm saying is the native resolution of the panels are only 1024x768. The TV processes the signal down to fit, because the pixels are rectangular. My Xbox also shows me the same screens, and guess what? So does my 6600 based HTPC, as does my old X1950, now dual-8800 based gaming PC. Truth of the matter is, actually, pixel for pixel my Dell monitor is more precise...
Trust me, I'm not a pub expert
oh and hd source material is all over the place so he would have lots to decode
he wants to stick a dvd in his pc and for him to hit play and for it to be displayed on his tv (thats decoding) i dont see a mention of him connecting up a very high end sony camcorder to create hd movies ?
You've obviously gotten yourself very tied up in your pub knowledge - my whole post at the top of this thread (which you need to read again) suggested two very good boxes which are not of the sort of caliber you're insinuating that I suggested.
You brought HD into this, and I pointed out that to put any HD signal into a computer, you need a hell of a lot more processing power than you seem to believe.
Decoding a file that's on the computer already is only the half of it - but you'd still need a fibrechannel array or a good stack of disks to be able to stream it. Simple answer is disks STILL cannot stream a consistant 25mb a second on their own.
my tv does 1-1 pixel mapping fact the panel is made by auo
also an other error is you stating the pixels are square this is only the case on alot of older plasma displays to compensate for the fact they only display a 4x3 image, not lcd's most lcd's have a resolution of 1366x768 and upscale 720p to fit its oddball resolution my tv has a 1920x1080 panel supposedly the same one thats in teh sharp xd1e 42" wich is a CMO panel
http://www.cmo.com.tw/cmo/english/product/showtv.jsp?flag=20050408182850
my tv does 1-1 pixel mapping fact the panel is made by auo
also an other error is you stating the pixels are square this is only the case on alot of older plasma displays to compensate for the fact they only display a 4x3 image, not lcd's most lcd's have a resolution of 1366x768 and upscale 720p to fit its oddball resolution my tv has a 1920x1080 panel supposedly the same one thats in teh sharp xd1e 42" wich is a CMO panel
http://www.cmo.com.tw/cmo/english/product/showtv.jsp?flag=20050408182850
Aw, poor you with your inferior blacks.
but you think a hd dvd drive can lets take the HR-1100A hd dvd drive as an example it connects via udma 33 (standard ide cable) its bandwidth is far lower than sata2
i think you're both confusing the poor lad!
i agree but tbh you are usually lucky to find a drive that will hit its max playback speeds anyway there are always overheads. i mean ultra 320 scsi cant sustain its max thearetical bandwidth either. regarding sas is the future for servers these days anyway unless you really want to spend far too much on a san implimentation