The order of events that led to the problem:
First: Lambo driver sped (against the law)
Next: Person pulled out in front of him, allowing enough time when doing so for him to approach at a legal speed and not hit them
Next: Lambo driver failed to perform an emergency stop because his speed was excessive, thankfully though he only hit a motorist not a child
In my opinon the Lambo driver was the one at fault, but sadly for the person who pulled out, who did so based on the assumption the lambo wasnt driving like a tit, he made an incorrect assumption and the insurers will probably side against him as his action is undeniable where as the lambo one is more open to interpretation.
If the person pulling out had checked twice he would've realised the lambo was speeding and probably tutted and shaken his head thinking what a pleb. Then would've pulled out behind.
Either that or thought wow that sounds siiiiiiick. Then pulled out behind still.
Thankfully it was a nice solid lambo, not a biker that would've either been through the passenger window head first or straight over the bonnet.