ClioSport.net
Register a free account today to become a member!
Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Read more here.
Tuning Results
- Thread starter ja.jack
- Start date
182 CLIO SPORT
Would like to see them aswell as i think thats way to high for 2little mods
I've heard that criticism of RRs before, is it true? If it is then why bother. Best test I reckon is to go on an airfield or track and compete against lap times set by others (next Cliosport SW airfield meet on 25 Feb).
Cheers, Rob
The critism of RR's is true. But its difficult to compare around a track too unless you borrow the Stig to the driving or something. Driver skill can make a fast car look slow and vice versa. (Witness my times at the airfield
)we have nothing to hide with our products. Here is our rolling road result....
Tho a think it might come out small due to Fotki....
Power is up across the rev range, as is torque.
Dotted lines being original car, standard system but with ITG panel, then solid lines with BTB system fitted.
I would like to see YS's, Powerflows, Prospeed's, Janspeeds etc etc etc before and after results.... if they exist.
almost slagging you? I said the gains were poor for the mods, but as long as you're happy... but if you say so lol.
I'd expect more gains than that from a chip alone, hardly unreasonable with the money these mods end up costing. My Williams when I had that made 156bhp completely standard bar the gearbox that needed the power run doing in 3rd gear and a huge flat spot (will see if i can dig the graph out), with just basic mods like exhaust, decat and panel filter it felt quicker. With cams it was ruthless, so I've only ever had a good experience from car tuning. Once I managed to get a close(ish) map there wasn't much in this club that mod for mod would touch it.
V6 Exige, GTR R35
thing is though that the figures havent been flawed...... unlike other companies
RB 182 Cup
are you stalking me?
lol, wonder which other company this could be? hate to disappoint you once again, but the Willy was never RR'd at GDI, the only time it went there was to get cams installed by Ben under AWT and it was RR'd at RE Performance in Bury...
ja.jack, I like your attitude... wish I could be the same, but playing with my money is like playing with my emotions lol
VRS
cup 182 mit stripes
Thought I detected an underlying hint of annoyance cos the mods did'nt live up to what you guys thought they should. How very bizarre!
I think what we have here now is strong evidence to suggest group N's and pmurray's, not forgetting inlets, are not all they are cracked up to be.
I think what we have here now is strong evidence to suggest group N's and pmurray's, not forgetting inlets, are not all they are cracked up to be.
Milltek'd 182
I think we need more cases...people that have the mods (RR'd or opinions) need to comment! especially on 'is it worth the money..'
£170 for inlets circa £350 remap and nearly £600 (BTB as example) is alot of money...(well for me anyways!) so it would be nice to know if people who have it done think its worth it. I'm not saying the products aren't good...just think customers opinions are needed.
D
£170 for inlets circa £350 remap and nearly £600 (BTB as example) is alot of money...(well for me anyways!) so it would be nice to know if people who have it done think its worth it. I'm not saying the products aren't good...just think customers opinions are needed.
D
There pretty good gains IMO.
The engine already produces 90bhp/litre with good torque. Tweaking the map whether its a group n or a p murray map will get you better gains in driveability but peak gains will be small as the original map will already be optimum on full throttle and 5k rpm + revs.
I saw a thread on the williams clio forum where some foreign bloke had a throttle bodied engine that reved to something like 9000rpm! and had 240bhp. This would be a pretty hardcore engine that made all its its power 5krpm+
From what I have seen on this forum a 182 will make approx.
+5bhp with exhaust filter remap
+15bhp with that and cams
+40bhp with all the above and ITBs
+45bhp with higher compression
Thats for a car running road cams and peak power at around 6500rpm.
I hae seen people claim ridiculously high figures for there mods but they dont add up when you look at the big picture.
Fair play ja.jack for doing the back to back tests you cant really argue with the results can you?
The engine already produces 90bhp/litre with good torque. Tweaking the map whether its a group n or a p murray map will get you better gains in driveability but peak gains will be small as the original map will already be optimum on full throttle and 5k rpm + revs.
I saw a thread on the williams clio forum where some foreign bloke had a throttle bodied engine that reved to something like 9000rpm! and had 240bhp. This would be a pretty hardcore engine that made all its its power 5krpm+
From what I have seen on this forum a 182 will make approx.
+5bhp with exhaust filter remap
+15bhp with that and cams
+40bhp with all the above and ITBs
+45bhp with higher compression
Thats for a car running road cams and peak power at around 6500rpm.
I hae seen people claim ridiculously high figures for there mods but they dont add up when you look at the big picture.
Fair play ja.jack for doing the back to back tests you cant really argue with the results can you?
VRS
well hopefully i will be able to report back soon as im currently rolling road hunting at the mo
as i said tho, ali's 172 was getting around 190 with the same mods as mine and the only difference between our cars is that i have a 182 and therefore have a 182 manifold fitted. hopefully will be mid 190's but will know for sure when i can get my arse down to nick at hollpower and get on the rolling road
Similar threads
