:cheers:
ClioSport.net
Register a free account today to become a member!
Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Read more here.
Turbocharger or Supercharger??
- Thread starter Ben_Stevo172
- Start date
-
- Tags
- turbo
:cheers:
RSTuning
ClioSport Club Member
R35 GTR
Same as anything and it depends how it's driven really. Our stock engine that we ran at silly boost is fully stripped and there was only a problem on the crappy cast on one piston's ring land. Pretty good for a 100k engine really. The mechanical side can be a minefield on these at times anyway, we've seen totally standard 40k cars throw a rod for no reason then others are abused so much and just take anything you throw at them!
172 - 249bhp @ the wheels
car in question has done over 8k since install all on a 100+k original engine, not bad considering the idiot driving it
Fletcher
ClioSport Club Member
Who's that then?
thejesus??
Supercharger FTW!!!
[youtube]XPhTFQFMI5Q[/youtube]
^^^ That's an Eaton M45 doing it's loudest + best to create 190bhp from 1341cc and 8v's. The engine was originally designed in the 70's and had 45bhp from 1272cc. The supercharged standard car with 8:1CR has 115bhp. You need to spend the money to make boost reliable. That now has forged pistons and a good intercooler set up to keep things running cool. Linear delivery, the noise and the performance of superchargers are great. If you're not chasing numbers I'd pick one over a turbo. I wouldn't be surprised if the Polo had more than 100k on it before the huge increase in power.
[youtube]XPhTFQFMI5Q[/youtube]
^^^ That's an Eaton M45 doing it's loudest + best to create 190bhp from 1341cc and 8v's. The engine was originally designed in the 70's and had 45bhp from 1272cc. The supercharged standard car with 8:1CR has 115bhp. You need to spend the money to make boost reliable. That now has forged pistons and a good intercooler set up to keep things running cool. Linear delivery, the noise and the performance of superchargers are great. If you're not chasing numbers I'd pick one over a turbo. I wouldn't be surprised if the Polo had more than 100k on it before the huge increase in power.
Last edited:
sounds like a milkfloat :dead:
More power, HUGELY improved reliability, less torque sub-3k so it's actually driveable...and some would say the noise...other would disagree.
R5 GTT EFI Clio.
Turbo all the way 
Focus RS Mk1
i was gonna say the same, with the rotrex's the power increaes with revs! opposite of running out of puff!
Fletcher
ClioSport Club Member
Oh i see..
The figures speak for themselves, Eaton cars run higher power mod-for-mod. The G40 is a good supercharger for producing low down boost but it's not as suited to producing large amounts of boost at high rpm's as the M45...it was originally designed as a pump in the 1800's. You don't generally get G40's over 180-190...Eaton or 2 running at 220...Turbo is ideal as you save so much without the parasitic loss of driving the charger. You'd reap. the costs back in a few charger rebuilds, £300-500 every 20k miles hurts.
ITB'd MK1
172 - 249bhp @ the wheels
Does look that way! pmsl
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IKU0...howthread.php?t=23694&feature=player_embedded
ITB'd MK1
SC Ph1 172 and M140i
Fook me, thats rapid!!
Nice!
Nice!
I know of one person who fitted one to a Polo, he actually managed to shorten the boost pipe work by about 5ft as well. They seem to be really good...but pricey!
Similar threads
