Chic, you dissapoint me gunshow.
Scarab green on dark F1's is awesome
The 182cup was 2% lighter than the 182. The 200cup is 3% lighter than a 200. If that 1% makes 1 pointless and not the other..........well it's nonsense, isn't it? Neither of them are about true weight saving, they are about making it cheaper to get into an RS. The end!Exclusive was a good car.
For me, the most pointless was the 182 Cup. None of the extras that a normal 182 had, but none of the weight saving the 172 Cup had.
Just a pointless edition imo.
Gordini 200
/Close thread
Exactly. So if the 182cup was pointless, the 197cup and the 200cup are! Only difference being they actually look worse with the unpainted bits! And you got the cup spoiler/splitter thrown in with the 182cup, you get fack all with the mk3 cup's! You west country bumpkin!
I'd sling the Trophy in as pointless. Doesn't have the everlasting dampers of a standard 182. w**k.
You're bald. Ergo your head looks like a thumb. Thumb-head.I'm going to come back and argue with you tomorrow when i've not been drinking.
Four eyes.
You're bald. Ergo your head looks like a thumb. Thumb-head.
You're bald. Ergo your head looks like a thumb. Thumb-head.
172ff is a unicorn.
if you preferred ''rawness'' then the cup was available; a normal 172 was for those who preffered ''luxuries'' so to speak, i wouldnt say its pointless.id say the ph2 172 " FF edition "
after the sharpness/rawness of the ph 1,
they followed up with overweight,middle of the road ph2,
compared to its ph1 younger brother and the agillity/rawness of the 172 cup
FF was a sort of disapointment/ step in wrong direction
What about the Megane renaultsport diesel? Why has no1 brought that up yet?