Recent content by SamP

Sunglasses in Mayfair by Sam Pegler, on Flickr Shot on my RB67. So much better than a DSLR for street, you can go about your business pretty much unnoticed with it.

Sack off the shard, go http://www.vertigo42.co.uk/.

Depends entirely upon what you're interested in surely? I'd go check out Smithfields/Columbia Road, but I enjoy shooting street so it would differ for other people!

^^ Dont like that at all sorry. Way too much saturation imo. Gonna go shoot it on large format so I can sort the verticals out as its horrendous atm.

Come play large format. f64 ftw.

Hey ;) You can take me for a ride in your Aston etc etc. 45 degrees to camera right above at 45 degree angle with grid to cut down on spill on walls etc.

New self portrait. For s***s & giggles.

Surprisingly this thread was less retarded than I anticipated.

Test. by Sam Pegler, on Flickr Softbox + Grid 18 inches from face above right. Just having a giggle checking bits ready for a shoot. //edit - Beard has gone since.

The watermark looks horrendous, I got bored of trying to look at the pictures through the watermark. Use less images and pick stronger ones is all the input I've really got to give.

British Journal of Photography (http://www.bjp-online.com/) is the only one thats worth looking at imo. The others just talk about gear, which tbh you can get better advice on online.

I gave up looking when I saw watermarks on all the images. I mean, come on... They're like 600px web images.

Post some pictures up of street at 200+mm on a crop, im intrigued. Shot at ~40mm from 1m away tops; Brick Lane by Sam Pegler, on Flickr

Shooting street at 400mm equivalent? Jesus, is she trying to shoot voyeur street or something? There'll be no connection, the images will be totally flat and lack any depth? If you're shooting traditional street you'll want to be between 24 and 85mm to have any kind of connection. 35mm on a crop...

You just have to not give a flying f**k and be willing to take s**t for what you're doing.