Search results

R3NNO ;)

Id rejest it if it had more than 20 or 30 miles on, no doubt some of the staff at renno will have a blast in it before you get it. Ive seen Vauxhalls staff in leeds blasting up and down in a new astra GSI, naughty boys

I think we need to club together to buy you a paddle m8, get you out of sh*t creek.

Quote: Originally posted by Adamf on 16 November 2004 My mate hit a Stag on the A22. Did he still get to the wedding?

can also bee a sign of a dodgy head gasket but doubt it on a new 182

cars are for driving, mines 18 months old and 19k, not loosing any sleep over it.

all sporty cars are difficult to sell. The assumption is that there all thrashed so people prefer to buy new. Its not just renaults although 182s look to be as bad as 172 for depreciation

just want to register the fact I dont care :)

we have a method round here called taking your car to a garage in bradford.

lets face it they are all ten a penny these days. I would personally go for a 2nd hand 172 mk2 if I was in the market for a car right now, they are cheaper to buy (because some mug like me who bought one new has taken the big hit on the depreciation) Youll loose less in £ if you buy the honda...

Ive done 1/4 miling in near identical conditions, once on optimax and then on 95 ron, got exactly the same times. Im under no illusion that the car feels different with it in. As a matter of fact I put some optimax in today by accident (drove up to pump where they were out of 95 ron) so I...

Its a trading standards worthy rip off that for some reason intellegent people seem to be falling for hook line and sinker.

Mugs the lot of ya, I use almost exclusively asdas finest 95 ron, get the same 1/4 mile time with that as I do with optimax. I think its one of the biggest trades descriptions cases ever waiting to happen. 98 RON does NOTHING.

well my 172 was faster than a 225 TT on a few occasions, would murder one now with decat/filter etc

looks good that m8

For all the figure quoting and stuff (yawn) 172 are quicker than zr160s, simple fact. One of my neighbours has one, thay are decently quick no denying that but 172 is quicker through all gears and you can throw it into corners "frighteningly quicker" this is what my m8 said when he was in the...

I spotted some paint runs on my 172 when it was two weeks old, went to renno and was told there was nothing they could do because I hadnt spotted them in time and they could be dodgy repairs for all they know. Just one of the many reasons Ill never buy another renault.

dont really rate them, nice interior but your paying V6, Evo, STI, and 220 Turbo money for a golf thats not all that quick.

get chips away round m8, 50 quid tops and it will look like a new wheel, amazing what they can do

I noticed a smell of windscreen fluid today on the 172 that was whilst taking a roundabout at 40mph so I think that might have been something to do with it

Id buy a second hand one, Id never buy a new renault again just because of the risiduals. That 182 looks a bargain tho

172 tyres should last 7-8k if your driving correctly

If you buy a V6 you will be a driving god amongst mere mortal drivers like the rest of us. If you buy an N reg merc youll look like a pikey who bought an N reg Merc.

No Just...No!

do a search I did a bit of digging to try and found out what they actually did to the cars.

Ive got R3NND for Renno (with the D reworked to look like an O) R3NN0 was £1500!!!

^^^ Hes right, running in is for pussies.

Traffic cops always increase their presence in an an area following a fatal accident, there was one just outside micklefield on the A1 a week or so ago, on wednesday this week they had a van there with 3 (three!) marked cars pulling people. Basically take it easy in know accident blackspots or...

anything synthetic will do, Im sure some people will be more fussy than I am about it but I just bought some valvoline fully synthetic

mine whistles at motorway speed unless you have the fans on (even if they are on but set to zero)