Search results

Demon Tweeks Sell them i think.

when i saw the pic i assumed it was some new mondeo variant of some sort. Walnut anyone?

chav imo

im going to have a go tomorrow... as ive got to take the rest of the exhaust off anyway.. hopefully will make it more manouverable..

Ring Renault UK or if you have a solicitor have them send a letter.

that spoiler is a joke.

not the point though is it? your not allowed to turn your clocks back. plus its not like you have even replaced every engine component.

my injector worked itself loose on my 1.4 16v and fuel was running down the front of the engine, thought i could smell fuel a bit in traffic started to feel feint after a while lol.

W Reg 99 ph 1 172 44k

i would have just disconnected the lock rods so they serve no function, but if you were wanting to achieve the smoother look then fair enough.

why won't it work?

bump

theyre ph2 seats (Renault sport should be in colours) and the leather should be blue.

rear beam bushes aren't that prone to wear but depends on mileage etc. Check exhaust for touching the beam or for leaking shock.

as fred says they don't have a cable type shift but sort of a rod that goes from the shifter to the box so any movement is directly transferred. If its really bad it might be worth changing the Dogbone mount as they do get worn over time. This reduces engine movement and as a result gearstick...

given the choices you have given. dci 65 is much more driveable imo. feels quicker due to torque, Cheaper on fuel and tax, plus will be worth more when it comes to sell.

ive got a regulator if you need one, easy to fit.

got the new engine fitted in the 172 but can't get the manifold in place... only a few mm's before i can get a nut on the stud to hopefully pull it against the header. Any tips? clearance is terrible.

motorfactors?

what model of clio is it?

pretty much yes.

axle tramp

course there is a way... only difficulty would be quarter panels, which are hardly hard to fit.

will be the resistor pack. very common failure.

would have gone for the 2.0 engine myself... same work roughly.. 172 engine is hardly bigger in real terms and much better performance. i would see it as more of an achievement. its probably going to be similar in performance to a saxo vts.

his comment was just the most retarded ive ever heard... especially as it would have been under warranty recently.

you don't have it, its a totally electric setup.

hahahaha this is funny..

sounds good are your stubs ok?

he might have fitted HID's to stock headlamps. Illegal for road use. Looks Like its probably a shed and was repaired to a budget. I would look for another.