Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Exactly. I dont have a clue. Hence the confused symbol in my post due the fact I struggled to make any connection between the image of a 10 year old Clio and Ferrari!!!
So a P reg Renault Clio extols the correct image??
If you want image, day to day driveability with the option of a bit of a blast at weekends, I would say get a Porsche 911.... just my 2p...
As you said, same spec apart from Cat 1 Alarm. Provided the car was imported from within the EU, you will get a full three year warranty. LeeM has more info on this, do a search....
Imports generally sell for less second hand, not sure why exactly (all the Renaultsport models are made in the...
Subaru STi Type RA Spec C. Might even be quicker than 0002.....
FQ 330?? Or am I barking up the wrong tree?? Does it have to be new??
VX220 Turbo for weekends and a 350Z for the daily commute?? Theres too many to choose from... narrow it down a bit!
Have to say its a nice position to be in!!
I would say 6.9 - 7.0 is about par for the course for a 172mk2.... I would be very surprised if mine wasnt capable of consistent sub-sevens... in the hands of someone who can actually launch the fecking thing anyway.....!!
No worries mate. Im pissed now, so I guess that makes us even!! Looks like Im with you on this one. If I wanted peoples opinions on a comparison ( or whatever) between the 182, 172 and Cup, I would post it on another forum becuase on here I know it will end up in mindless tit for tat bickering...
@ Jon1978....
Are you calling me stupid?!!? I didnt make one single reference to performance. In fact, I didnt mention anything about the cars themselves, merely the attitudes of the respective owners. Is it any real wonder that we have infighting when people are called "f**king stupid" for...
In excess of £1200. And thats being optimistic... loom alterations, plus they have a self levelling mechanism and require washer jets iirc..
Next best thing is to get some different blue lamps....
I would say 30% Jealous 172 owners and 50% big headed Cup owners. I can see why people on here have become sensitive to the Cup vs 172 debate. There are a few 172 owners who are jealous and a few Cup owners who like thrusting it down thier throats!! Hence the constant bickering!!
I wasnt on...
How accurate is that time though? If we go down that road we could be here all day!!
I ran mine in in the same fashion as RichD, but I have no recorded proof of performance (accurate or otherwise!!) to say whether the method I used hindered the performance of my cars engine.
Looking at Richs...
Ive driven one, several times. Took it for about a 18 mile round trip through twisty A roads in the wet on one occasion. Nearly went side-on into a van when overtaking it due to torque steer. Horrendous in the wet. Really hard to keep the thing going in a straight line, and for your average...
Hehe 6.3... thats f**kin ace.... Im gonna get one, sod the expense!!
If they managed to do 6.3 with the traction control on, they know something I dont.... I dont think I could get below 10 in my 172 with the TC on!! LOL!!
Absolutely f**king shocking. Amatuers.
Xenons will cost a fair amount to retro fit. Just a bit more than different lamps lol... serves em right, but a bit of a ball ache for you. Will be worth it though, xenons look fantastic. Good job you noticed...
Obviously not. But your post wasnt much more use than mine!!
<edit> oops... I think I may have mis-read your first post... when you said " completley useless response", were you talking about my reply or yours??!