ClioSport.net

Register a free account today to become a member!
Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Read more here.

172/182 inlets



so Roamers car actually went up 11bhp at peak, but with filter, cat back, remap and cams timed... not just a viper and remap, which sounds more like it.

Stan - mine was mapped on the same RR yup, but it had other mods and wasn't there for before and after RR's as it had already made 196bhp (iirc) with cams etc... so no need for anyone to go back with the car for the final run ;) Fair play, I realise headwork is your business etc, but I'm not convinced on these figures... at all. I just fail to see how far out the stock car can as a blueprinted Cup race car with breathing mods and chip only would end up about 400bhp lol... doesn't really make sense, you'd think the inlet was part of the group N spec if it's that bad as stock?
 
  2005 Nissan Navara
Its likely isnt in the grpN spec as regs wouldnt permit it perhaps....in which case builders would look for the best match from a pile of different parts.

As far as the figures im quoting go, the 182 im on about made 167bhp peak before inlet mod, completely standard.

Believe me, dont believe me, I dont really care tbh...I know those figures are true.
Whats more import though (than figures) is the way they feel on the road afterwards...it cant really be disputed that gains arent impressive for whats involved both money wise and work wise.
 
  Lionel Richie
with the locking tools you plonker

you mean that the pullies have no mechanical locking method and are held on by friction thus meaning they can be roated freely by 360 degrees when loose

doesn't mean their adjustable pullies john!
 
with the locking tools you plonker

you mean that the pullies have no mechanical locking method and are held on by friction thus meaning they can be roated freely by 360 degrees when loose

doesn't mean their adjustable pullies john!

their not vernier adjustables no, but they are adjustable, otherwise how can cam timing be varied??? lol. I know how they work fella and as cam timing can be altered freely, so that to me is adjustment. Try getting the same accuracy out of a Mk1 stock pulleys.
 
  Lionel Richie
unless you make up a custom tool it can't be varried, and to my knowledge no one has ever done that because its pointless
 
why would it be pointless? If you want to run wilder cams that peak too high up the rev range how would you time them back without verniers?

and yeah, I know cam and ignition timing are different... hence me asking which it was, as it wasn't clear in the post if it was cam or ignition timing that was altered or both
 
  Lionel Richie
re read roamers post, there's nothing there about cam timing, its purely software alterations (fuel and ignition timing) you assumed timing meant CAM timing
 
yup, I got giddy and saw timing and assumed the pulleys had been messed with the alter the cam timing. either way, it's still 11bhp with viper, cat back and remap.

173 - 184bhp. 11bhp increase from three mods.
was probably 168-170bhp before remap and any mods. That's upto 16bhp, so inlets as well would take it to 197bhp... possible, but HIGHLY unlikely. People expecting 13bhp from inlets will be disappointed either way, very misleading imo.
 
  Lionel Richie
but thats also called playing the max power numbers game

air filter + 5bhp
exhaust + 5bhp
remap + 10bhp

all three of them combined doesn't = a real 20bhp!
 
  cup 182 mit stripes
How very disingenuous of you Fred. In your line of work it's absolutely essential for you to play the Maxpower numbers game.
 
but thats also called playing the max power numbers game

air filter + 5bhp
exhaust + 5bhp
remap + 10bhp

all three of them combined doesn't = a real 20bhp!

this is the point, so inlets alone will do very little unless the car was fucked to begin with, in which case Renault should foot the bill. It's stupid when people quote this 13bhp gain like it's something to write home about, it's not, the cars in question making these gains are well down on power to begin with. Granted, for the money it's a nice little mod but people love to get carried away and quote misleading crap all the time, then some unsuspecting noob see's it and assumes he/she's going to get the same results.
 
  2005 Nissan Navara
the inlets do do quite alot tho, thats why we see gains....its nothing to do with cars being fucked, my mates was less than a year old, fully serviced and in MINT conditiuon!!!

to be fair, most of them are down on power to begin with. this isnt to say mods are less worthwhile, its just part and parcel of manufacturers quoting the best figures.
 
  Lionel Richie
stan will know more about it than i do as he's a flow specialist, but i believe its something to do with pulse tuning inside the inlet/plenham, or am i talking b****cks
 
  2005 Nissan Navara
well a mismatch in a joint which encounters airflow is going to create energy loss in the flow. its going to disturb the flow, casue areas of turbulence which causes a restriction

manifold matching is nothing new, i think on these engine we see nice gains because theres two joints, as opposed to just one on many other engines. consequently theres twice the disruption in flow.

The fact still remains its a very worthwhile mod.

I sell a fair few of these over the t'internet and always have good feedback. I also have cars in the workshop regularly having this work done on the spot, and again when the owners collect and test drive they are always pleasantly suprised with the gains they have experienced first hand.
 


Top