Chris n nic said:But imagine being someone who tries to make their car look like one by adding the same wheels.....
Chris
lagerlout1 said:It's quite considerably cheaper to make an FF look like a Cup than spec a Cup up to FF standard!! I wonder how much Renault would charge for Cruise Control, Xenons, Leather, Climate etc?
pecan said:Who the f**k would want to spec a Cup up to FF standard? That's a rediculous comment. The whole point of going for the Cup is because you don't want all of that bullsh*t.
kullycliosport said:ok.....................172 cup wannabe ???? runs 4 cover
kullycliosport said:think he was joking fella................ .
cup owners say cups r better
full fat owners say theirs r better .
2 many variants and points make them different .which is the best which i would agree is the best of both worlds which would be a 172 full fat cup packed monster :S
jaf78 said:I had the same dilemma before i bought my cup. The main reason for me was that the cup is far better looking. Granted I also had a look at a FF 172 and it was a very nice car with the better interior and extra toys, but at the end of the day if i wanted a nice comfy car with 'toys' etc then i woudnt be buying a clio.
pecan said:Who the f**k would want to spec a Cup up to FF standard? That's a rediculous comment. The whole point of going for the Cup is because you don't want all of that bullsh*t.
lagerlout1 said:However, if Cup owners don't want all that, how come once Climate control was made as an option on the Cup every Cup sold from then on had it fitted?
lagerlout1 said:As far as performance goes, there couldn't be a much worse thing than climate control!! Extra weight and robbing the engine of a few bhp when the compressors running!!
lagerlout1 said:Oh sorry I forgot, it's because all Cup owners are so hardcore....