RR figures are from 1 of the most accurate wheel dynos there is. Why ?
Because it uses 1 big inertia roll of 440 kg/m2 and the simple Newton law of motion formula F=ma. No other fancy software algorithms and tyre crushing too small rollers. Plain & Simple.
Figures are SAE corrected @ wheels and off course everyone calculates flywheel figures differently.
What matters here is, that a Clio2 C&B pumps out equal/more power and torque than a stock 197.
In such a lightweight chassis as the Clio2 that is a lot of fun
Also note that the 197 holds a little longer > 7k rpm but the 172 has the better overall torque figures(!)
Car Facts
Clio 3 197
- No mods , 167.6 BHP SAE corrected @ wheels
Clio 2 Cup Phase 2
- 169.6 BHP SAE corrected @ wheels
- C&B cams
- RSTuner remap
- 182 Manifold
- decat
- Matched inlets
- V6 Airbox
- 1 proud owner
Please note:
Had to take 1 power / torque curve out of the sheet due to a false measurement.
Many thanks to Frank for making his car available on such short notice.
Because it uses 1 big inertia roll of 440 kg/m2 and the simple Newton law of motion formula F=ma. No other fancy software algorithms and tyre crushing too small rollers. Plain & Simple.
Figures are SAE corrected @ wheels and off course everyone calculates flywheel figures differently.
What matters here is, that a Clio2 C&B pumps out equal/more power and torque than a stock 197.
In such a lightweight chassis as the Clio2 that is a lot of fun
Also note that the 197 holds a little longer > 7k rpm but the 172 has the better overall torque figures(!)
Car Facts
Clio 3 197
- No mods , 167.6 BHP SAE corrected @ wheels
Clio 2 Cup Phase 2
- 169.6 BHP SAE corrected @ wheels
- C&B cams
- RSTuner remap
- 182 Manifold
- decat
- Matched inlets
- V6 Airbox
- 1 proud owner
Please note:
Had to take 1 power / torque curve out of the sheet due to a false measurement.
Many thanks to Frank for making his car available on such short notice.
Last edited: