ClioSport.net

Register a free account today to become a member!
Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Read more here.

Clio TT v Supra



  MERCEDES CLS AMG


It is a fast time for the track condition - it was that bad a lot of people were asking for there money back as they shouldnt off allowed it to go ahead. I set off on one run and could see mud and slutch flying up in the air and landing on my car - it was that bad !! It was the worst track conditions i can ever remember.

York raceway need to get there act together - they charge you £10 admission and £20 to race. Multiply that by the amount of people that spectate ( over a 1000 ) and the number that race ( over 200 ? ) and that gives you a lot of money. They never invest it in the raceway and the queing up and track conditions are sh*te.

YORK RACEWAY - get the waiting area tarmaced and invest in a track drying machine like santa pod........instead of buying fire engines that pull wheelies with our money !!!!!!!!!
 
  Polo GTi


Quote: Originally posted by Adams_16v on 28 March 2005
dirty boy!

whats the cossie behind u? looks mad!

No idea what it was but I have a vid of me beating it off the line for about 2 secs, hehe It wasnt an ordinary Sierra it has tyres at the back like tractors really wide, they went well into the boot, some sort of custom jobby
 


yeah know what your saying m8, its a bit of a joke considering. when I went it was dryish, but you can see on the way in that rain+cars = sh*t everywhere!

well, either way Matt 13.8 at 110 aint shy and considering the conditions thats gonna prolly go down by around a second id imagine, so its gotta hit 12s easy. you gonna run it at POD as well then, just for the York time doubters?
 
  MERCEDES CLS AMG


The Pod isnt in my good books - went there 2 years ago and it took me 3 hours there and 3 hrs back. When we arrived it was raining and it took them 1 hr to dry the track off. I watched 2 races and it started to rain again and then it was called off for the day. I spent 6 hrs travelling to watch 2 nobs in 1.3 fiestas doing 18 sec qtrs !!!
 


that sierra is a V8 jobbie. My first ever drag race was aginst it, i held him til after 1/8th of a mile when it TANKED past
 
  BMW 320d Sport


LOL York vs Pod again. Theyre both a hell of a distance for me so Im not biased. I dont think you can really say whats what about them unless youve been to both at least once every year. But one thing I will say is complaining that York is too far when youre happy to go to York because its local...thats a pretty lame excuse LOL. Neither are local to me, nor have they ever been, and I still try to visit York when I can cos its a better friendlier scene even if it does smell of pig sh*t!

Pod is better for definitive times. Im not saying that I dont believe York times, because Ive run at York loads, and their equipment is just as accurate. But rightly or wrongly, people dont argue with Pod times and in quarter miling, thats what you want. Its just something that has to be accepted.

York is better for road cars on road tyres, fwd especially, because of the road launch surface that you can use if you want to, and most people do. Worth up to 0.2 of a second on the 60ft which is what I reckoned it to be just from experience, and then a little while later I got a York newsletter come through to me, and it actually said that the York organisers reckon the same thing.

So the bottom line is, every quarter miler whos not playing around, takes and uses every advantage they can to run the ET they want. If they run at York because they know that on road tyres there they get a better launch, then why not? If they run at Pod because its nearer, or because its more official then, again, why not? Times are times.

mailto:13.8@110">13.8@110 is very good. 13.8 neither here nor there really, you cant be sure about a dry ET from that, but that terminal speed is a humdinger. Congratulations Matt!

Lastly mailto:LOL@theJesus">LOL @ theJesus, "wonder what Nicks planning to beat it now"...I dont need to beat it, mine is STILL the fastest Clio and thats not changed! But obviously the time Matts put in is hefty, and I would be surprised if he couldnt hit a high 12 at 115 in the dry, which of course would beat me. Assuming I dont swap in a set of green Cossie injectors, a 2.5 bar MAP sensor and remap it for 300bhp...its just a question of time.
 
  MERCEDES CLS AMG


Thanks Nick - shame about yours breaking down at the ring mate. Its bad enough it happening close to home - but in another country..... thats a ball ache !!
 


hehe, faster now, would be interesting to get them both side by side to see where eah car pulls on the other tho. I think it should be a race to see who can get to 400bhp first ;)
 


Quote: Originally posted by j3ned on 29 March 2005

im happy with the power its kicking out - although NOS is tempting as the Audi lump can handle it
what about a charger as well, Delta S4 style! :devilish:
 


id deffo go for nos, if you put anymore normal power through that thing that cant be turned off it will be even more outragously quick! so get the nos to slow you down, if you catch my drift! lol
 


Top