Bang on, and it's pretty obvious really - I don't see why these threads always turn into a boost vs itb debates as there's never a definitive answer. Other than pub talk
Its much like the recent threads on the RS2.
People were moaning about the torque figures not being as high as on 438 cammed cars etc, which is of course true, but it doesnt stop it being a fantastic modification.
Basically with an RS2 on an F4R and a set of 197 cams, it drives like its the worlds best 1800 engine bascially, 140lbft for the entire rev range and 200bhp at 7800rpm is fantastic fun to drive, it just feels so relentless and keen to rev etc. Sure it doesnt have the brief torquey midrange hump you get on a cammed motor but thats not always a bad thing as the problem with a brief surge in torque is that then when its over the car then feels flat after that. Where as if instead of high torque in the midrange and low torque at the topend, you have medium torque for the entire rev range it just feels relentless and is very rewarding to drive as it goes the same at any rpm so it doesnt feel flat anywhere at all compared to anywhere else.
But trying to explain that to people on here is a waste of time I have found, some of them just obsess over peak figures and cant understand that its only any good having torque if you have it for more than a few hundred rpm, and IMHO you have to drive one to appreciate it really, and even then peoples tastes are different and some will love the crazy way they rev and some will hate the fact they dont have that brief torque shove, it all depends on what you enjoy from an engine.