This arguement is pretty much apples to oranges by the looks of things 110hp vs 160hp, experienced driver vs. average driver eh??? lol!
In the assumption this is your "original point" i hope you have another point to make as this one is... well, quite obvious really
"..But back to my original point, a well driven ZR160 can beat a average driver in a Clio 182 on testing roads (not a motorway!) In just the same way a 182 in the right hands can spank a Subaru Imprezza"
Whats your view of the point in that may I ask?
If im reading into what you are trying to say correctly, you are basically saying that "car A" with an experienced driver can beat "car B" with an less experienced driver than car A, when car A and Car B are of a similar level of performance.
Does it matter what car A and B are?
Shoot me for being simplistic but arent you just stating the obvious here? Clearly you are. With that in mind you really have no point at all here. You could apply your logic to the BTCC, WRC, F1 etc etc. The car makes little difference (as long as they are of a similar level of performance).
But then again what would i know, i only drive a 1.4