ClioSport.net

Register a free account today to become a member!
Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Read more here.

mk2 v6 vs 182 cup



  Lionel Richie
most people go by GPS, i do! my V6 has done 153 (book figure) on GPS down Bruntingthorpe, which was about 164 approx on the speedo
 
  Mk2 172
anyway this has answered all my questions now. the v6 is faster. thats absolutely fine by me. i knew it was anyway. like i said was just just curious by how much. :)
 
  53 Clio's & counting
iv read through this and my own opinion is people who own the v6 love them,people who dont own a v6 dont think there worth the money lol

interesting reading tho :)
 
  Lionel Richie
don't get me wrong, the V6 once you get use to it isn't blisteringly fast, a test drive doesn't give a good idea of the car, you have to live with one for a few months to really get into it
 
This thread has run dry I think.

There is only one winner here, and it's the Renault Clio






V6 255!

agree.... :)

thing is, they don't make either anymore and we are stuck with the 197 :(

bye bye Renault :(

I will be off to another marque next :)


Simon
 
  PH1_172
V6= much lushness

looks better then a 182, IS faster then a 182 and is more exclusive then a 182 i know what id have

V6 end of


im trying to sway my boyfriend to get one but he keeps saying hat his m3 and cossie are quicker, but im telling him the V6 is better, looks better and will also give him enough cash left over to throttle body the Vee......but he know wants a stripped pulsar :(
 


Top