lol..world peace sounds promising.....aint ever gunna happen tho lol.
And i dont think you'll sneak it past on the CC lol.
He speaketh the truth
can't wait for next week though when the fun begins :evil:
I can empathise with you BenR, as we are both a bit mad. Fortunately for you, you have been blessed with talent.
Is MarkM's clio the one to showcase the new induction system?
whats the quality of the 172 heads, inlet and exhaust like in standard form?
Whats to stop anyone getting a set of jenveys, a nice ecu, arp rod bolts and bolting the lot togethor?
Nothing, from what Ive heard from Ben thought the 172 heads are very hit and miss due to crap castings. Personally If you're fitting ITB's you want to work on the flow of things to get the best out of them......
172mk 1 heads- not great
mk2 heads, reasonable
182 heads, pretty good (Far less gaines to be had)
172mk 1 heads- not great
mk2 heads, reasonable
182 heads, pretty good (Far less gaines to be had)
whats the quality of the 172 heads, inlet and exhaust like in standard form?
Whats to stop anyone getting a set of jenveys, a nice ecu, arp rod bolts and bolting the lot togethor?
Because to fit ARP rod bolts the rods have to be resized due to higher clamping loads which distorts the cap. That means engine out and apart, so for some £80 bolts, your got alot of money to spend fitting them.
Just bolt on the bodies and go, as the pistons will fail before the rods do.
172mk 1 heads- not great
mk2 heads, reasonable
182 heads, pretty good (Far less gaines to be had)
:S
Phs1 172's have the highest flowing combination of the lot.
Phs2 172's and all 182's have a significantly worse exhaust port and basically the same inlet.
Between any of the models inlet ports, there is no more than 1-2% difference.
And gains to be had are massive due to poor seat profiles from factory, and all the wrong port shape for a performance head, the valve area isnt utilised as effectively as it can be.
if you have done all the other bits... and you want more... then..
:S
Phs1 172's have the highest flowing combination of the lot.
Phs2 172's and all 182's have a significantly worse exhaust port and basically the same inlet.
Between any of the models inlet ports, there is no more than 1-2% difference.
And gains to be had are massive due to poor seat profiles from factory, and all the wrong port shape for a performance head, the valve area isnt utilised as effectively as it can be.
very interesting...