Quote: Originally posted by Vee Six on 30 May 2005
Im off, to many heres relief.
I have some Staffordshire country lanes to blast.
Lets hope I meet an old 1993 Williams, with its meagre power and brakes.
Hee-hee.
TATA!
I might just come up and kick your arse then.....
Quote: Originally posted by James on 30 May 2005
Quote: James and Matt i believe, are simply adding theirs.
Quite right Tom, and I can assure this thread WILL NOT be allowed to continue will only one persons incorrect opinion being final.
INCORRECT OPINION? MINE?
What about YOUR incorrect opinion?
You wouldnt get close sunshine, even before the (soon) rise to 300 bhp.Quote: Originally posted by Matt Wills on 30 May 2005
Quote: Originally posted by Vee Six on 30 May 2005
Im off, to many heres relief.
I have some Staffordshire country lanes to blast.
Lets hope I meet an old 1993 Williams, with its meagre power and brakes.
Hee-hee.
TATA!
I might just come up and kick your arse then.....
Quote: Originally posted by TomS on 30 May 2005
If you start a thread like this one, your going to get a range of different opinions.
Seems to me VeeSix hasnt got the views and opinions he was looking for....
You think I care what someone in an old classic thinks?
Do me a favour. Just educating a few here who are stuck in the past.
After the brathing mods., I will be mixing it with TVRs and Porsches this summer, not a bloody 130bhp 1993 hatchback.
LMFAO
Quote: Originally posted by Vee Six on 30 May 2005
Fine by me. July sees the car (as discussed on another thread) get 300 bhp / 230 ft lbs and very sticky tyres.
The std V6 is 221 ft lbs already, so is that a mistake? would have though for an extra 50bhp torque would have gone up by more?
btw, dont let this lot of V6 hating guys get you down, most are just jealous as hell, as for James, he has a V6 (and a V6 site), if he really thought the Williams was better he would have one, dont you think??????
Simon.
Quote: Originally posted by James on 30 May 2005
The 2006 Clio will probably turn round in my road in less than 17 moves. Now that is certainly BEST in my book
Quote: Originally posted by Ben j on 30 May 2005
in years to come... the V6 will just be and old cool car
a Williams will still be a CLASSIC
Willaims aint a Classic, its just 1990s fast hatch period, on the other hand with less than 200 v6 255 in the country the V6 will be the classic mate.
Simon.
Quote: Originally posted by Leachg1 on 30 May 2005
For a pure driving experience, the Williams will not be beaten. Plus it still looks amazing
Only 150bhp is NOT pure driving experience and its LOOKs crap imho, way to OLD now....was good in its time, but its time has GONE...
Simon.
Just taking over form Vee Six on his quest to show thw world the V6 is AWESOME....
Quote: Originally posted by Martin. on 30 May 2005
Ah well at least I can console myself in the thought I can still hand a v6 its ass on plate in my 12 year old relic!
Well I could hand my V6 and your 12 year old relic there asses on a plate with my 14 year old relic too (200bhp GT Turbo, if I still had it), but not if they were std for std....which we are talking here....
I still know which car Id rather have, and it aint your 12 year old relic .....
Simon.
Quote: Originally posted by TomS on 31 May 2005
Simon I dont think any of us were dissing for want of a better word the Clio V6.
Just a lot of people actually think the Williams is going to be the all time classic, and therefore the best clio Renault will make.
Just opinions, I wouldnt take it personally,
Tom
Thats fair enough, but a 2.0 ltr clio with a Williams badge is NO classic to me, where as a Mid engined, RWD 3.0 V6 Clio is.
Just my opinion this time...ok
Simon.