Must bo one of the lower power french ones . Try mine would be vvvvvv fun.Quote: Originally posted by Adams_16v on 15 October 2004
my mates mk1 runs the same 1/4 mile times as my old 16v, the yellow beast leaves it for dead tho
dunno m8, it was a hell of a lot, it was like it was stood still. You have to bear in mind that from 20mph to 100mph I can do all of that in 3rd gear. My friend in the valver had to change into 5th before I was even in 4th. His is standard, mine has filter, decat, backbox and gearbox.Quote: Originally posted by 106GTi97 on 14 October 2004
10 car lengths? 70-100 fk off pmsl
Quote: Originally posted by mr bognor on 15 October 2004
Must bo one of the lower power french ones . Try mine would be vvvvvv fun.Quote: Originally posted by Adams_16v on 15 October 2004
my mates mk1 runs the same 1/4 mile times as my old 16v, the yellow beast leaves it for dead tho
santa pod over the next few weeks?
Quote: Originally posted by SOOTY on 15 October 2004
So would any of you guys prefer a Williams to a 172 then?
Yeah if it didnt come in that horrid blue colour
Quote: Originally posted by mr bognor on 15 October 2004
Go out and get fu*ked and stay out all night then we will race at pod the next day
Quote: Originally posted by Adams_16v on 15 October 2004
Quote: Originally posted by mr bognor on 15 October 2004
Go out and get fu*ked and stay out all night then we will race at pod the next day
suppose thats one way the 172 could have a chance hehe
There is no mk1 billabong its only in mk 2 form and the mk 1 172 looks totally diff from other mk 1 & its 6.8 to 60 mph so yes is faster than a mk 2 .Quote: Originally posted by paul1178 on 15 October 2004
Williams or MK1 172...Willy any day, the mk1 looks way to standard for me especially from the back, could easily be a Billabong. Mk1 is a good sleeper I suppose.
Is the MK1 172 faster than the MK2?