Is that defined as "proper" stance? (srs question because everything looks the same to me except it's an old golf, wheels are the right size, seats are nice and arch gap is spot on.)
I appreciate the hardwork & money that went into that car. However all I see (besides the exceptions stated above which is maybe what adds up to make it "proper") is
- Ruined suspension geometry
- Huge scrub radius
- No sidewall strength
- No camber thrust
- Very firm ride
- Little suspension travel
- Poor traction/grip
- Touring-car spec camber (it's a bit like slapping an F1 rear wing on a Clio because F1 cars are fast and they have rear wings)
- Stupid looking tyres
Maybe you lot are plagued by cars which have the above in addition to:
- Happy meal toy hanging from a towbar (to show how low their FWD "drift" car is FFS)
- Monster stickers
- Bonnet bras
- Wrong sized wheels
- Stupid looking wheels (which are either: fakes, genuine & worth more than a small house or 19" Bentley wheels on an A4)
As for no two cars look the same... haven't you seen all the VW Polos/Golfs that line up at your local Mcdonalds/Halfords. They are all identical except for different wheels. Camber, lows, correct arch gap = "proper" stance? So every single racing car is the ultimate in "proper" stance