Search results

Yea, goodwood is bad. I got a LOUD car but i passed with 96db. Just make sure the engine is hot and move the rev counter up the tacho as slowly as you can. And if you want contest them, ask them for their calibrating DB meter, each bd meter needs a more acurate meter to calibrate off...

with 160 ft.lbs at 6000rpm the max bhp you can attain is about 182bhp.

yes yes and yes. its not like F&TF, it doesnt blind you with Gforce, its like a nice progressive pull that makes you happy, and the smell is something else......strawberries i liken it to...odd ones, but still strawberries! lol

Man i wish it was as simple as that. But roamer will have a completely different power delivery, plus hes running std cams. And to put it mildly, Philp has been at this for months, broke his engine, ot at it again and tried seriously hard....so all credit. I have no problems with...

stan stan stan When were tuning for all out power, and the higer the rpm and the higher the flow demand your main concern is simply getting all the charge into the cylinder as fast as you can withing the tiny time constraints. SO, if you get rid of swirl features you get 2 straight shot...

well, to be honest, you cant directly relate body diameter to possible torque figures. The XE only makes 150bhp because its inlet manifold design aint great and the cams dont help. the S1600 series runs a restricted 60mm tb and makes about 220bhp at 8500 odd rpm. Type Rs make a hell of...

sorry mate, i didnt get a PM.....my box was full when i got home.

i would if i wasnt so far away in Sussex.

never heard of it.....the problem that is.

why cant a single TB unit not flow enough, its over 70mm in diameter.

so your problem was the exhaust?

no, valvers usually let off large clouds of black smoke.

I get custom valves made. And swirl is a economy measure. there is nothing really wrong with the port shape, its just a bit too large for the intended road purpose.....if were going balls out it has its benefits.

There is a massive difference. K&N is old 60s technology with poor filtration levels, they reply largely on maive marketing and million mile gaurantee to replace broke ones since the are so cheap to make. I know alot of buddies in the states that do motorcross and baja racing and they...

lol, i fully agreee mate.....

yes, for a while.

ill third that!!!! :devilish:

Indeed, but if most people looked after their braking system (regular yearlyor bi yearly bleeds) then this wouldnt be a problem.

I will setup an group order anytime anybody wants, groups from 2-10 kits get discounts, but the more people, the more discount. Richy, dont worry mate......you can run 100bhp on N20 without worry, its all about how you introduce it, when and what ignition/fueling your running. Progressive...

agree. You cannot test a cat....they test the lambda. And MOT emissions standards are low.

agree!

To put it simply, yes as std form its horrid. They basically cut the back side off a clio and drove a V6 laguna front into the gap and welded it up. THey jsut locked the steering, and thus there is flex on the track rods. Hence the flappy rear end. Suspension upgrades will make it better, but...

Any specialised coatings shop is able to help you. Powder coating an item is no specific to what it is. And it might work out cheaper if you get it shot blast, then take it to get powder coated.

It protects the braking master cylinder and associated gubbins.

bingo bango! would be nice to see it out on track sometime!

ahh right!....so did you specify pin and compression heights, bore, taper crown thickness etc etc....or was it a by chance sort of thing? Sounds nice.

YES! lol with such a poor rear end, the only thing they could do to make it safe for the market is to make it handle overly safe.

1. yes 2. 77 00 847 363 CAT CONVERTER C2 243.00 ---3 x 1 77 00 418 958 EXHAUST PIPE C2 24.00 ---3 x 1 77 00 418 778 SILENCER REAR C2 57.50 ---3 x 1 These should be correct, but since the parts on the Renault parts system look nothing like they do on the actual...

yes