Search results

it's a single hose for a start, with a breather take off built in, and the insides of the filter are the clever bit. It's definitely not an ITG (LOL!!!!)

lol, no it's not

you think? I thought your car was blinding for that considering it's not ITB'd. I think you might be remembering the trumpets too well

should be a lot closer, if not spot on. Lambda sensor would be the next thing I'd change if it still fails

£1329 from me, or £1499 with matched inlets at the same time

that's the thing, there's no downside IMO, they're just a bit more on top everywhere. Yes you'll pretty much always have a bit of a dip, 182 manifold smooths it out to some degree

I'd say that was still cold when they did it personally.

438 idle is better than standard

yeah can be. Don't expect much in the way of peak figure gains, but lower down it's quite a good thing to do

That's entirely the important thing. As I mentioned, it took a lot of extra fuel in the midrange over the standard map, so there was definitely a big chunk you gained there. I really liked it beweek 4.5 and 6k the best

Well a 182 I did with 428s and a few other small bits made 185 at SRR so I'd say you'd do that or thereabouts The ph1 did 185 with the KTR induction btw so the stock airbox and elbow is definitiely holding it back a little

Put it on SRR Sam, then I'll believe it ;)

Not fitted one, but had a look at one a few weeks back, it's not just a spacer, there's actually a cat substrate in there

I'm sure they're a different length, even by a small amount. They're 100% different part numbers

mild cams to be honest, they're only 428 replicas really. Drives well though and it's a definite improvement from before. I would have prefered to fit 438s, but I can only give the options, not force anything on people :)

yeah, and noisy or not noisy. You're in Bournemouth, why not call K-tec and ask if you can see/hear one on a car. I'm sure they have various systems on a number of their own (employees) vehicles. I know Bex had the recessed on her ph1, Not sure what Anthony has on his.

Care to elaborate? I'm on my second mild steel system (on consecutive cars) and I've been nothing but happy with both. The mk1 system sounded amazing, and the 172 stealth looks and sounds not far off standard

Phone in general is far better, internet browser is FUCKED

unless it's a cup, you'll need a new tensioner. Replace the whole kit

My dad has a Midget. Jacked it up once using the provided jack and original mount, and it tore a hole up the rear quarter. Rot box!

Sounds like you've got some megane mk1 bits on there (From memory the part of the linkage attached to the box on those is shorter)

certainly is

I would be pretty confident that was my RAF mate who was out there recently, following a link on my page :)

My prefered method is let them get warm then stone cold at least 3 times before really hard use

I'd Polybush the arms and fit new balljoints rather than getting whole new arms. Be marginally cheaper too.

No I have my own 172 for that ;) :p Might do you a bit of a deal if you come and have them fitted though

It's REALLY easy, I never use HTCsync as using google for contacts and chrome for bookmarks works so well. If you log-in to chrome on a pc (with gmail), it will give you the option to sync all your bookmarks across devices

I have a set on the shelf ;)

Grounding out will do that to anything though, Mild steel is actually less crack prone than stainless

I would probably say 2.5 for a balls to the wall build