I think they have made them this way because they are reaching their top power, if you want any quicker get a megan etc. The fact they have kept the stats similar with such a heavier car is i think what they aimed for cos you get alot more for your money.
What bothers me, is that vw can produce a more powerful engine (mk5 gti) pushing a heavier car, that mullers the 197 for economy. As can mini.
Rofl at designed for track use.True but the clios have not been designed to be performance road cars imo more suited to track use, where as cars such as the VW's and mini's have been, and are both turbo charged engines with more torque where a road car needs it.
The clios pull well enough in the power bands and how often on a track would you drop below 5000rpm on a track?
The VW's and Mini's run out of steam alot earlier then the clio, but due to them having the power in lower revs they are more economical as they aren't being pushed as hard.
Minis also hold their value very well.
Everyones different but they don't seem to have any problems selling them.
Have to disagree. Massively. The Mini isn't quite as sharp at the edge, but there's a nat's whisker in it. And the Mini's quicker and more economical to boot.Got mine for under 14k for the sport with extras, it has everything you need. It isnt the best quaility but its is a vast improvment on the past. You cannot throw the mini around like you can the sports.
I'd have a 200 over a VXR/CooperS (probably) and a Fiesta ST.
That's what it's up against. Golf/Megane/Focus is a different class regardless of power/MPG/price.
I've not yet driven the 200, but the Cooper S is a better car than the 197 in pretty much every way (bar looks) IMO.I'd have a 200 over a VXR/CooperS (probably) and a Fiesta ST.
That's what it's up against. Golf/Megane/Focus is a different class regardless of power/MPG/price.
See my above post.And the mini is no way quicker
Same old post, same old input, from the same old people, that have never driven a 200
5 pages???
Paul
Renault missed the mark with them by making them too big, too heavy and too poor on fuel.
If you were in the market to buy and run one you could/would consider much more powerful cars with the same running costs which would sway your decision away?
Discuss.
And same old owners stamping their feet with their fingers in their ears.
It's a forum. Things are here to be discussed.
How do you know what I've driven?
Point me in the direction of a much more powerful car that I could:
Buy for 15k with 3 years waranty
Insure for the same or less than a 197 (Which is already cheaper to insure than a 1*2)
Achieve 29mpg average
Service for £135 a year
Replace tires at £80 a corner
Cooper s is under 16k and mullers the clio's for resale. And is cheaper to service. And more economical. Financially a far better proposition. Fugly though.