ClioSport.net

Register a free account today to become a member!
Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Read more here.

Clio 172 v civic Type-R



  FF 182, v6 wheels
Im getting my clio 172 finally sorted later this week:

de-cat

k&n filter

and super chip installed,

my brother up in stafford has got a Civic Type-R and im going up to see him,

any ideas how it will match up to him on the A roads?
 
  VaVa
Pretty close below a ton. CTR may still have the edge, but not by much. You'll get chance to overtake when he stops to drop off some bread.

But never mind that... I wanna see you do the worm!!
 
  RenaultSport Clio 172 CUP
On the B roads near me (172 Cup) i was playing with a type r, i was taking corners faster.. but was not pushing it but i guess he was not aswell, dont agree with full on racing on roads.. just had a little play :)

but he did not keep up with me :/
 

TimMB

ClioSport Club Member
  Trophy
I think if we're talking 0 - 100mph, the largest factor will be the driver ability due to how closely they're matched.
 

Ali

  V6, Trackhawk, GTS
top of 3 and 4th Type R has the legs...

Me and my Bro are very capable on track and he was defo catchin me.

Not next month tho!
 
  Megane Mk4
CTR's have the advantage of being able to rev upto 8.5 too so that'll go in their favour a lot, especially on the straights. On the twisties you'll have the better motor imo, RenaultSport clio seem to like them :D

I'll have to agree with .Griff. on that too,
You'll loose power in the K&N .. I've got one and I'm taking mine off when I'm able to afford a ITG panel filter for the original box. (http://www.k-tecracing.com/show_product.asp?id=1359)
You'd be better getting one of those. ;)


Andi
 
  Weeman sucks ****
If the driver is capable then I doubt any mods apart from a 400bhp conversion will divide the 2.

The better driver will win...if it's a manly race type thing, of course.
 
  1998 BMW e46 323i
the type r has the ability top end speed wise and it handles better. There's no question.

The only comfort I have is the spec levels on the 172 mk2 full fat; basic air con on the CTR was an optional extra costing a bag of sand! Never mind climate, leather etc...
 
  cock mobile.
john.med said:
the type r has the ability top end speed wise and it handles better. There's no question.

Top end speed maybe; handaling I doubt it.

I wouldn't say they handle as well as my Cup (can't comment on a normal 172 tbh).

It will come down to the driver, one missed gear and it's all over.
 
  RS-1, Bebop, CTR
john.med said:
the type r has the ability top end speed wise and it handles better. There's no question.

The only comfort I have is the spec levels on the 172 mk2 full fat; basic air con on the CTR was an optional extra costing a bag of sand! Never mind climate, leather etc...


The CTR has a better engine, there is no question of that. As for the handling, i would say it's not really better than the clio's, but different. It's all down to one's personal preferences.
 

Ad

  MK2 FRS
Is a little bit too early for me to pass full judgement, but overall at mo I reckon theres not much in it, however, I am still in the comfort zone with the CTR and haven really pushed it too the edge yet. The CTR definitley has more grunt, but the 172 is fractionally better on turn in.

(I have had 172/182 and now got CTR)
 
  Lux'd Glacier White R26
Again? Lol. The Type-R would win top end, but who in the right mind goes above 140+ mph, just to say "i've beaten you"? Day to day driving, there's nothing in it. On that note, enough said.

TYson.
 

Ad

  MK2 FRS
ben_p said:
^^^ ull find out about more grunt shortly

knobhead.... lol.

I nearly put a comment on for you.... and then changed my mind...

I will clarify... It will have more grunt that any non Cat D repaired 172s.:evil:
 
  FF 182, v6 wheels
thanks for the advice on the ITG panel filter. oh and griff what 2 "mods" are a waste of time? what would you recommend?
 
Im pretty sure once my brother gets his K pro on he will beat me though (sigh) he recons it will give him 220hp for £800ish so I guess it will be off to GDI for cams and a remap then :D damn, why do I have to be so competitive with my brothers!!! :rolleyes:
 
  172 Cup
SCOTTY2HOTTIE said:
thanks for the advice on the ITG panel filter. oh and griff what 2 "mods" are a waste of time? what would you recommend?

K&N and the Superchip.

ITG panel filter instead of the K&N and decat/cat back system are good starting points.

An SMT6 is much better in the long run as opposed to an off the shelf generic "super"chip.

Have a look/speak to GDI (Andy) - http://www.greydevilindustries.com/
 
  172 Cup
Gaz Sport said:
Im pretty sure once my brother gets his K pro on he will beat me though (sigh) he recons it will give him 220hp for £800ish so I guess it will be off to GDI for cams and a remap then :D damn, why do I have to be so competitive with my brothers!!! :rolleyes:

What's a "K Pro" gaz?
 
Im no honda expert just listen to my brothers babble evry so often about hondas taking over the world. But its an ecu uprade not sure on exact details but the honda engine can achieve good gains from ecu mods ie 20+hp
 
  172 cup TT
I have always been concerned as to if the superchip on my cup was the cause of my 1st engine failure... dunno why just got a feeling... as it allows it to rev to close to 8k...
 
  BMW 330d :)
Ali said:
top of 3 and 4th Type R has the legs...

Me and my Bro are very capable on track and he was defo catchin me.

Not next month tho!

yeah but you have the heavy version ;)

And i beat 3 type r civics at crail but it was very close!

Fraser
 

Ali

  V6, Trackhawk, GTS
^ Thats different! I'm talking about rolling 30+mph to 100! From a standstill the sheddy cups have a considerable weight and traction adv!
 
  MINI JCW
Nothing in it at all, if anything the clio is slightly faster to 60, there pretty much equal to 80 and the CTR is slightly quicker to 100 but is marginal. Has it has been said before it will come down to the driver!
 
  A Fast One!
Gaz Sport said:
Im pretty sure once my brother gets his K pro on he will beat me though (sigh) he recons it will give him 220hp for £800ish so I guess it will be off to GDI for cams and a remap then :D damn, why do I have to be so competitive with my brothers!!! :rolleyes:

he sure will woop yer ass if he gets k-pro, which can be picked up for about £600! for those of you asking what it is, its a sisterboard add on to the ECU that is hardwired in. i think it is more advanced than the smt6 as you can plug your laptop into it and load either one of 5 standard upgrade maps from one for induction and exhaust all the way to a supercharger mod, fully customise mapping for your engine and its exact mods along with full data logging which records all sorts of engine variables such as a/f mixtures, injector efficiency readings etc (too much to list)... the main advantage of this though is that you can change when the cam profile changes over in stages of aggression. instead of having it come on cam at 5800rpm for example you can drop this down to the most aggressive setting of 4200rpm, then increase the rev limiter to 8600 - 8800rpm (a potential of 5000rpm of being on cam!) for that extra grunt and a much wider powerband! it also has a launch control setting which means that the idle rev limiter is brought down from 5000rpm to about 3000rpm so that you can bounce it off the limiter at standstill, drop the clutch and off you go with minimal wheelspin possible (still depends on driver ability for that one tho!)

if one map doesnt work too well then you just load another. the thing with the CTR guys is that it will cost them about £400 to get a new map done on a RR at system R for example but everyone shares them around as its just a case of saving the map onto flash drive and then re-loading it onto your laptop and then into the k-pro!

most people who buy k-pro for the ctr will already have at least a catback, induction kit and often a decat or race manifold. add the hondata k-pro to this and your looking at around 235bhp quite easily at the wheels without upgrading to Toda or Skunk2 cams........ the easiest way to describe it is its like the real life version of the fast and the furious laptop gadgetry that you see in the mitsubishi eclipse on the 1st film! :cool:


as an ex-ctr owner who currently owns a 172 Cup i would say that there is not a lot in it at all. the ctr engine engine as standard does have the advantage of hitting the limiter at 8250rpm but then again it only comes on cam at 5800rpm so the powerband comes in later than the 172. the ctr is also heavier at 1240kg......

in terms of on A roads its definately going to depend on the driver until about 100mph if both cars are standard as the ctr has the advantage of a 6th gear, with a shorter 5th ratio topping out at about 125ish mph. i would say that on B roads the 172 would do very well as the handling gives you loads of confidence as there is predicatable understeer and lift off oversteer which is easlily controllable when you push the car hard.

with the CTR it has very numb steering and you can definately push it very hard but it depends on whether you have the confidence to do it because of the lack of feel through the wheel (basically how big are your b*llocks).... i have pushed my ctr to the point of no return and believe me its scary as the car will hold on and on but then all of a sudden let go giving you snap oversteer with you at least facing the oposite direction to where you were going and at worst in a ditch which is what happened to a friend of mine recently! i ended up with snap oversteer facing the opposite direction on a roundabout!

i hope that helps with the debate ;)

Alex
 
  A Fast One!
adtmits said:
The CTR definitley lacks some torque as you up hill 'action' proves.

have you got a 30AE? couldnt figure it out from your avatar as the 30AE has the same seats as the DC2 ;)

Alex
 
  MKIII 138
surley the point of a performance car is being able to drive safely on the limit and extract maximum fun without killing yourself + others.

neither cars should be put to test on the open road as a track should be used. but if you do want ot risk your life going silly fast then the CTR fails miserably as explained, you simply dont want to be going faster than the car wants too on that given road at that given time in the cup/182/172 you get feedback and a controllable back end in the CTR it can be gameover before you even realise it.
for that reason it isnt a performance car i would want.
 
  RenaultSport clio 172 mk2
tell me about it and its even worse without traction control or esp! like myself!
 
Spykee said:
most people who buy k-pro for the ctr will already have at least a catback, induction kit and often a decat or race manifold. add the hondata k-pro to this and your looking at around 235bhp quite easily at the wheels without upgrading to Toda or Skunk2 cams........

Alex

:eek: That would mean 260hp+ at the fly, surely not!!!

My brother has an icebox filter on his CTR but keeps telling me he wont be upgrading his exhaust / manifold as the stock 1 is so good that nothing is gained by doing this also he recons throttle bodies and cams dont get much of a power increase either. Superchargers are where the smart money goes where a jackson kit can produce between 250 and 300hp and cost a mere £3-3.5k fitted. :evil:
 
  A Fast One!
Gaz Sport said:
:eek: That would mean 260hp+ at the fly, surely not!!!

My brother has an icebox filter on his CTR but keeps telling me he wont be upgrading his exhaust / manifold as the stock 1 is so good that nothing is gained by doing this also he recons throttle bodies and cams dont get much of a power increase either. Superchargers are where the smart money goes where a jackson kit can produce between 250 and 300hp and cost a mere £3-3.5k fitted. :evil:

well i dont really rate the IceBox, its expensive for what it is (basically a modified std airbox) the AEM Cold Air Intake and the GruppeM are far better and this is proven as my mate kenty had his car RR'd for a back to back test on the most popular IK's for the car, the post is on the CTR forum if you want to check it out.

in terms of power gains im just reporting what i have seen gaz, that is based upon an 18% power difference from the fly to wheels! from what i have seen there are hardly any limits on what the k-pro can do, there is a guy on the CTR forum called TP who has 340bhp without his nitrous at the fly and its still N/A doing the 1/4 mile in under 13 secs!

yes the JRSC is a good bolt on mod but its pretty poor in terms of performace increase compared to a lot of other superchargers on other cars and the turbo conversion that you can get for the CTR. it only runs 4psi of boost with a standard pulley but even with that your definately going to need to change the exhaust system to something like an Apexi Hayabusa, Fujitsubo RM-01-A or Spoon N1 along with a decat and a DC or JR manifold! your not going to get 300bhp out of it with the standard exhaust system and without upgrading your cams and putting a smaller pulley on the charger to make it spin faster either. this is because you need to increase the boost pressure to get 300bhp......... im sure you would manage about 250bhp though. the tops most people get without speding out on major internals is about 265bhp N/A (with upgraded cams) and you can do that cheaper than buying the JRSC.

the hondata k-pro is an awesome bit of kit that has a standard map in it already that you can load so you just bolt on the JRSC and off you go! none of this re-mapping stuff like most other cars if you dont want to but its still advisable! new cams, k-pro and full exhaust will give about 50 - 65bhp increase and the manifold and catback system definately does make a difference as i have been there and done it and my car definately performed better than my mates one which at the time only had a GruppeM induction kit... i had 224bhp at the fly from a catback, decat and induction kit on the std ecu and internals! i had a damn expensive exhaust system though, which im sure made a difference!

Alex
 
Yeah some good upgrades for the Honda engines... I think you mean at the fly though with...

"most people who buy k-pro for the ctr will already have at least a catback, induction kit and often a decat or race manifold. add the hondata k-pro to this and your looking at around 235bhp quite easily at the wheels without upgrading to Toda or Skunk2 cams........"

but 235hp at the fly is still an impressive figure as a Clio sport would need throttle bodies, cams, injectors, remap etc to get close to that power!
 
  A Fast One!
erm no, i was stating it was at the wheels the 235bhp figure, i dont know what calculation your working at to get that up to 260ish bhp?! as i said, that figure was with an 18% drivetrain loss.

as far as handling goes there isnt much you can do about it apart from getting a full camber and toe fast road setup on all 4 corners or getting some bloody expensive coilovers!

Alex
 


Top