Quote: Originally posted by Hastings on 07 September 2003
thanks king.stromba, i have now got brainache, which is a whole new feeling to me as i never knew i had one.
u33db, mainly shopping trips, but 110k does denote the shop was in paris, lol
yeah, im gonna give them a ring tonight and try to sort something out, i have real reservations though as i know nothing about the engine and have been told its a 1.8 16v bored out, also been told the 1.8s werent v.good. What is the difference between the willy 1s to the 2 and 3s then?
on your advice peeps i may just buy it, then i will bug you all to give tips on gentle friendly modding and restoration.
cheers
The William is the boy: essentially to the 16V what the Cup is to the 172, a fettled edition of the standard hot hatch of the day. Of course, the Cup was mainly an exercise in lightening, while the Williams was a more comprehensive overhaul. Contrary to popular belief, the Williams had nothing to do with Williams: it simply used the name to celebrate the coincidental Renault-Williams F1 glory.
Basically, the Clio 16V was the homologation car for Renaultsport in Group A rallying and it was very, very good. Remember, they were putting this little 1.8 NA car up against cars like the Escort Cosworth, Integrale and the early Impreza.
They had a damn fine chassis with the 16V. In fact, the 1764cc car was 1.5 seconds per mile fatser than the legandary Group B 5 Turbo 2 300bhp rally behemoth! But they wanted to exploit the class rules that allowed engine capacity up to 2.0 litres. Hence the 2.0 F7R engine was born. When fitted into the Clio 16V works car, it rapidly earned its reputation as the fastest FWD rally car of all time. In fact, the 2.0 and the later Maxi version still hold numerous tarmac records. They later changed FWD rules so that 1.6 is now the class limit (Super 1600 Series) - perhaps a result of the Clio Maxi putting some big boys noses out of joint?
http://images.cardomain.com/member_img_b/286000-286999/286766_3_full.jpg
The great Ragnottis Clio Maxi
http://images.cardomain.com/member_img_b/286000-286999/286766_40_full.jpg
It was even good in the snow!
http://images.cardomain.com/member_img_b/286000-286999/286766_41_full.jpg
Clio Williams No.001 at the Williams factory (credit to King Stromba)
http://images.cardomain.com/member_img_b/286000-286999/286766_25_full.jpg
The Clio 16V
The Williams 2.0 F7R engine doesnt get much more power/torque than the 16V, but it gets them at lower revs (85% torque at 2500rpm - thats torquey!). So, off the mark there isnt a great deal between a 16V and Williams, but once you introduce a few roundabouts, T-junctions and hairpins its a different matter.
The Willy also got some suspension mods to widen the track (and different offset wheels to help further with this) and different coloured interior. Other than that, its a Clio 16V - so parts are fairly common, if a little expensive.
The Williams 1, 2 and 3 were sold with about 400 examples of each in the UK, so theyre pretty rare (when was the last time you saw a 16V, let alone a Williams!). The Williams 1 (late 1993) were numbered individually and were all of the Clio Phase1 variety. Williams 2 (early to late 1994) were half Phase1 and half Phase2 - so there are some minor cosmetic differences. All Williams 3 (1995) were Phase2 and had a different shade of blue paint and some "contoversial" options (sunroof, ABS - should a rally homologation car have them??).
Anyway, thats the bare bones. Theres a lot more detail, but my hands and brain hurt a bit now!
The Williams is a classic car already. Youd be a fool to turn one down.