With panel filter and down pipe back exhaust 130bhp is made on remap. Agreed vfm not worth it at all, the dci what turbo does ha have k3??
I am a grown up.
I love it when people come on asking for stuff and when people give their opinion they get all pissy about it..
Its a forum get used to it.
I for one would like to see a silly powered TCE so knock youself out, i look forward to the results
lol
Ask for help and opinions then get all gobby when you don't like the replies!! Yep some maybe pointless and some from people who know what they are talking about.
And still ignore genuine guidance so tbh waste of time this thread
Thanks for coming Westytce
If needs be i have fuel pump from a 172 you can have, all ud need to do is cover the postage..
The fella wanted advice on an external waste gate not weather or not to do what he is doing. Otherwise the thread would have been called
"Should I bolt a bigger turbo on my tce"
Op has a right to get "pissy" over people who sit there and complain.
Btw. In my reading and experience, will be no need for an external wastgate with what you are doing
Im guessing its the more polite version, as he doesn't like Arse.
You'd be wasting money IMO, the 1.2 is never going to have the flow to worry about an internal wastegate causing boost creep
I try and avoid external gates under 400bhp as a general rule of thumb TBH
It would look cool though....
im not doing it for power... It's a 1200 remember...
Thanks but Please keep opinions like this to yourself and be helpful with the technical side of things.
Oh dear, you're one of those, lol
Because I find its just pointless extra weight and pipework and expense that simply isnt needed for lower power levels where the internal gates work well anyway.
You got these replies:
Then replied with:
which gave this reaction:
So, you've been given plenty of Proper advice. but still argued??
I've given you proper input. You don't need an external waste gate, I was running 360bhp on a gt2871r with no boost creep on an internal gate. The turbo you have doesn't have the option afaik for a non gated hotside. which then means you'll be going to the extra expense for no gain what so ever. With regards to the 1.2 engine, chip doesn't need to know about the specifics of an engine to know if its worth doing or not, especially on your application. I suspect He has built and mapped more high power turbo and NA applications than you've laid your eyes on. I've had the privilege of working with him, so I know to take his advice happily.
im not doing it for power... It's a 1200 remember...
Thanks but Please keep opinions like this to yourself and be helpful with the technical side of things.
oh and one other thing, are you doing head work to accomodate the higher boost levels?
iv had a look at those tce engines, your definatly going to need better injectors and a pump to even see any reall gains from the turbo swaps.
to say like you said, 100bhp is almost the max hp the standard tce injectors can handle. maybe more at a push, but think of it this way, its going to cost and arm and a leg to fix the fuel system if something goes wrong.
182 injectors i think fit, those coupled with a 172/182 fuel pump and you should see abit more power gain. ( still havent figured how the tce injector loom will pair up with 182 injectors ...? )
oh and one other thing, are you doing head work to accomodate the higher boost levels?
its a weak engine already, adding more stress is going to go bang.
Don't want a 197. A 197 isn't gvfm imo. Civic type r would make more sense for 200bhp.
I would have thought you will see reasonable gains from a bigger turbo without needing to touch the head.
Turbo engines tend to be a lot less bothered about head mods, until you are talking big specific outputs (ie 200bhp+ per litre on most multivalve engines)
Its better value than spending the same amount as the swap would cost on upgrades for your 1.2 which then wont be worth as much as a 197.
Just crack on with it mate. I'd be interested to see the results.
Understood, but do I want 200 bhp....?
Don't want a 197. A 197 isn't gvfm imo. Civic type r would make more sense for 200bhp.
Ok brilliant, I think I'll buy a second hand engine incase anything does go pop. Think they go for about £ 500.
Don't want a 197. A 197 isn't gvfm imo. Civic type r would make more sense for 200bhp.
What a weird thread. OP has an attitude problem.
If you mean Good Value For Money then I'm completely bemused as to how throwing money at a shopping trolley which will forever have the value of its base vehicle is in any way value.
The insurance will probably be similar, the only guaranteed saving is tax and I can't imagine an over-fettled TCE is going to bring in MPGs anywhere near the book and far closer to a 182 (if not the Mk.3 R.S. Clios).
I know you're going to anyway and hats off to you for it. Hell if we all just did as CS says then the club would be a far duller place, it's just I get my head around what you're trying to actually achieve. But that's my problem