ClioSport.net
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Read more here.
Quote: Originally posted by Rick on 29 August 2005
Andy, where do you get your inlet manifolds for the TBs from?
We get our manifolds directly from Jenvey to answer your question.
We do the bodies, ECU & fitting as a package for the UK market rather than as the individual components to make sure that they are fitted correctly and mapped properly.
/y0z
Quote: Originally posted by rmccardal on 29 August 2005
Quote: Originally posted by Fred2001Dynamic on 29 August 2005ross, Ben is infact wrong, Richard Jenvey works in Imperial measures
port spacing is infact 3.5inches (88.9mm)
[/QUOTE]Well unless jenvey are making the head now, hes right.He said "head port spacings" and the french use metric.
wrong wrong wrong, and WRONG
isnt he Benjamen????
audi S3
wright im fed up with this as mr clarkson said on top gear and this is true to his words put moth balls in ya tank and it goes a rocket SO THATS WAT IM GONNA DO
so BB--GDI--AWT--KTEC--HILL POWER and all the others watch out.
300 BHP FROM MOTH BALLS ALL YOU TUNERS WATCH---LOL---
MOTHBALL_TUNING.COM
audi S3
i dont no about mine fella
audi S3
of course fella
audi S3
dont forget to put the moth balls in big power
Quote: Originally posted by Fred2001Dynamic on 02 September 2005
no??? but thats what we were planning on doing!!!!!
its on standard monts at the moment = a bit crap
http://www.eroticon6.co.uk/images/mount.jpg
Out top mount just got ripped apart eventually, a better solution seems to be the original top mount but replacing the rubber bush with something a bit stiffer. Even worse though; if you look in the above pic to the left of the top left bolt the welds have started to pull apart and the bit of body where the top engine mount fastens was pulling apart from the chassis.
http://www.eroticon6.co.uk/images/weld.jpg
This is under the wheel arch where the spot welds on the inner wing have all gone.
Also the subframe was cracked in 2 places; basically it had shaken the whole thing apart.
You may be fine though; I really doubt that your car will get as much stress and punishment through it. We should have really seam welded the shell before doing anything really, but we were rushed so didnt bother. Maybe the mounts were just too stiff and needed just a little bit of give in them.
Anyway, fixed all the damage, welded it all up and the car was out last weekend....... where it has probably stripped the splines on the gearbox output shaft
Just a thought, but it would be in BBPTs ineterst to totally agree with the 28% loss figure, as it would surely make their Morego 202 more feasible based on RR figures?
As a side note, I dont entirely agree with the percentage idea entirely, as I dont think for one second that a 700bhp wheel figure means the dyno figure would be 1000bhp (based on 30%)...there must be a point where the realtionship changes between wheel and fly....you dont lose 300bhp in a drivetrain ffs.
Mint car btw guys
