ClioSport.net
Register a free account today to become a member!
Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Read more here.
106 GTi
I like the Vee but each time I look at them I spot odd looking bits I dont like.
Like where the rear arch meets the quarter with a cheap stuck on look and tacky looking line.
Clio V6 255
I've had my V6 for over two years and can safely say that it wasn't a mistake in getting one. Would it perform better than a 182 cup? In the right hands probably, but from the trackdays i've done each car has different qualities, i'd quite happily own both!
The v6 when treated with respect is actually nicely balanced on the track, and is so much fun!! you can slam your foot down out of the apex and off you go
The v6 when treated with respect is actually nicely balanced on the track, and is so much fun!! you can slam your foot down out of the apex and off you go
People go on about how fast BMW M3's are, yet they are only about 1s to 60mph and 3s to 100mph faster than a V6 255, the V6 255 is faster than a 182 by the same margin as the M3 is to the V6 255
A new M3 costs £15,000's more than a new V6 255, so does that mean that the M3 is not worth it too then??
So by your logic, if you want an M3........buy a V6 255 instead, as they are £15k cheaper and only 3s to 100mph slower or better still get a 182 as they are only a further 3s to 100 slower and have room for shopping too lol
Simon
We are talking about Clios here. M3's are a completely different car. You get a shed load more in a M3 for the money than you do in a V6. The performance from the M3 is fantastic and you get 4 seats, a large boot and BMW quality. You also get one of the most well-sorted saloons on the road.
V6 - hhmmmmm let me think.....you get a nice V6 and lots of kit. Oh yeah, you also get that famous Renault build quality and 2 seats.
Bad comparison there mate. My point is the price doesn't justify the car and I would buy the 330 anyway.
I do like the Vees, they are very exotic and you don't see them everyday but I would go elsewhere with £25K in my pocket. Maybe you should give me a shot in yours.
Subway - V6 - Supercar? Ha ha dream on mate!
yeah mate but the M3 is to the V6 as the V6 is to the 182, simple....
my point is the m3 is faster than a v6 by the same margin as the V6 is faster than the 182.......and looks 10 times better too....
but hey if you prefer a shopping trolly then the 182 wins over....lol
oh and btw you don't pay £25k for vee's anymore do you?
Simon
A v6 would tame a 182 all day loooong!
Supercar vs Hothatch? oh please
Supercar??? I dont think so. it does 0-100 in over 15 secs, slightly better than hot hatch performance.
14.6 to 100mph..... 3.2s better than the 182
but I guess it depends on what mag you read/believe, every 182 I've had behind me has stayed behind me by a long way too....lol
live your dreams guys, if it makes you feel better
Simon
I don't get the 182's, looks like my mums shopping trolly (so girlie), good for shopping though...lol
Simon
shouldn't that be "were not", as they have not made a new ones for some time...lol
Nobody I knew paid £27k for one either/
Simon
3.2?
14.6 to 100mph..... 3.2s better than the 182
but I guess it depends on what mag you read/believe, every 182 I've had behind me has stayed behind me by a long way too....lol
live your dreams guys, if it makes you feel better
Simon
If you want to quote figures, how about we quote autocars figures.
Which are 15.0 to the ton for the 255 and 17.0 to the ton for the 182 ff, so 2.0 seconds then.
Guess 2.0secs is light years lol.
Well the 182 is c. 17 to 100.
Clio V6 255
This thread is in danger of boiling over!! Some good comments have been raised, it's the xbox v ps3 for clio's!
Factors to consider: performance, pacticality, looks, cost - everyone is different, if we all had the same opinion then we'd all be ford owners so lighten up!
If cost is a consideration then so be it. It's what forms exclusivity. I'm proud to be an owner of a car that has huge admiration, full stop.
Factors to consider: performance, pacticality, looks, cost - everyone is different, if we all had the same opinion then we'd all be ford owners so lighten up!
If cost is a consideration then so be it. It's what forms exclusivity. I'm proud to be an owner of a car that has huge admiration, full stop.
you can think what you like, as can I, but I think you will find you are in the minority as regards the looks at least?
Simon
Clio V6 255
Plastic add-ons?! fibreglass i think you'll find. I hate to say it, but a bit of research goes a long way.
I'm in the process of repairing my power steering line, I removed all the trays under the car today; the work that has gone into the car is quite amazing when you take a look at what the engineers had to do.
At least you got the best colour, that is the best praise I can heap on it
14.6 to 100mph..... 3.2s better than the 182
but I guess it depends on what mag you read/believe, every 182 I've had behind me has stayed behind me by a long way too....lol
live your dreams guys, if it makes you feel better
Simon
If you want to quote figures, how about we quote autocars figures.
Which are 15.0 to the ton for the 255 and 17.0 to the ton for the 182 ff, so 2.0 seconds then.
Guess 2.0secs is light years lol.
yeah but Autocar are crap....
Simon
Yeah been doing road testing cars for 40 years must be.
Clio V6 255
Agreed, although Evo don't have 0-100 for the aformentioned cars, they do have them for the trophy at 17.3 and the mk1 V6 at 17 and the Megane 230 at 16.
The Golf R32 is 15.2, and the V6 is lighter than the R32 and is 182bhp/ton to 165. So i'd be inclined to put the V6 in the low 14s definately.
yeah but Autocar are crap....
Simon
Agreed, although Evo don't have 0-100 for the aformentioned cars, they do have them for the trophy at 17.3 and the mk1 V6 at 17 and the Megane 230 at 16.
The Golf R32 is 15.2, and the V6 is lighter than the R32 and is 182bhp/ton to 165. So i'd be inclined to put the V6 in the low 14s definately.
Unfortunately Gearing and the cars actual suspension setup etc has a play on the figures.
Bhp per tonne is all good and well but its not an absolute means of proving times absolutely.
MarkCup
ClioSport Club Member
The v6 when treated with respect is actually nicely balanced on the track, and is so much fun!! you can slam your foot down out of the apex and off you go
Ah ha, there's your problem...you should have your foot down way before the apex
Clio V6 255
Fair to say that absolutely. As i can't get any hard data, i'm making an assumption! I've always thought the Nissan 350z has a similar performance, but that's missing 0-100 as well.
E91 M Sport
The difference with the Nissan is that you can actually put the power down from standstill without melting the clutch and spraying gearbox oil over the engine bay
Imo, the 350z is the quicker car - but only by a gnats c**k.
Imo, the 350z is the quicker car - but only by a gnats c**k.
So that means the M3 can compete with some £100K cars, which means it is a bargain! The M3 is a classy looking car where the V6 is not. But it's not meant too. It's an 'in your face' all talking, not so much walking Renault Clio. If the 182 is a shopping trolley, girls car then fine. At least I won't be crashing my shopping trolley at 20mph, like everyone seems to do in their Vee. (I've seen at least 3 posts that said this)
Bottom line here is, people buy the V6 mostly on looks because there are better performing cars for the same price. If having a V6 sitting behind them makes them moist, fair enough. I personally think they look okay as I like Clios, but it's just over the top. Whatever price they might be, which clearly changes everday, the cost per mile is not worth it, in my opinion. If somebody gave me one, I would gladly take it for free!
Yakshamash
yeah but Autocar are crap....
Simon
Agreed, although Evo don't have 0-100 for the aformentioned cars, they do have them for the trophy at 17.3 and the mk1 V6 at 17 and the Megane 230 at 16.
The Golf R32 is 15.2, and the V6 is lighter than the R32 and is 182bhp/ton to 165. So i'd be inclined to put the V6 in the low 14s definately.
yeah but an r32 is four wheel drive and will get off the line better. guaranteed!!
KG Exige - ex-V6 owner
It HAS got a boot though - admitadtly it can just fit my laptop bag in, but it's a boot none the less. You can fit about 3 shopping bags in the bonnet too!
I doubt that very much - it's an enthusiats car, for people that know what it is and have picked it because of these reasons.
Sorry, but i don't agree with this either. I saved up until i could afford to buy it, and it could only be a wasteful purchase if i didn't value it - which I do. A great deal.The v6 is a great excuse for the well off to be a bit wasteful with money.
The difference with the Nissan is that you can actually put the power down from standstill without melting the clutch and spraying gearbox oil over the engine bay
Imo, the 350z is the quicker car - but only by a gnats c**k.
agree about the clutch though....v6 clutch's are s**t
I'm on my second and only done 15k, not sure how long that will last...
but not had a 350z get away from me yet
Simon
if we all wanted real fast cars we'd buy a TVR T350.....
Their are also better performing cars for the money than an M3, we could talk all day about this but the simple FACT is, the V6 255 is better/faster than a 182, period.....
unless you know of a std 182 that can top 153mph.....lol
Simon
Their are also better performing cars for the money than an M3, we could talk all day about this but the simple FACT is, the V6 255 is better/faster than a 182, period.....
unless you know of a std 182 that can top 153mph.....lol
Simon
i had mine on the limiter in 5th which was about 151 on the speedo
