Loaded the group n map on my ph1 today.
Really impressed with the difference. So much more driveable, you dont need to rev the nuts off it anymore to get it moving, however if you do theres now a big old shove up the top end of the rev range.
By no means am i claiming the numbers to be accurate, the point of the graph is to illustrate the change in standard map vs. grp. n.
Both runs were done in the same conditions on the same stretch of road.
Weight is probably slightly overestimated as i only weigh 70kg and i wasnt running with the spare in the boot.
If figures are to be believed before is 147bhp atw, after is 157bhp atw, making an atf figure somewhere in the region of 180ish. That seems high imo, however the car is running a cat back system, simota induction and matched inlets as well as the group n map.
Thoughts and comments welcome.
Really impressed with the difference. So much more driveable, you dont need to rev the nuts off it anymore to get it moving, however if you do theres now a big old shove up the top end of the rev range.
By no means am i claiming the numbers to be accurate, the point of the graph is to illustrate the change in standard map vs. grp. n.
Both runs were done in the same conditions on the same stretch of road.
Weight is probably slightly overestimated as i only weigh 70kg and i wasnt running with the spare in the boot.
If figures are to be believed before is 147bhp atw, after is 157bhp atw, making an atf figure somewhere in the region of 180ish. That seems high imo, however the car is running a cat back system, simota induction and matched inlets as well as the group n map.
Thoughts and comments welcome.