Search results

Sunglasses in Mayfair by Sam Pegler, on Flickr Shot on my RB67. So much better than a DSLR for street, you can go about your business pretty much unnoticed with it.

Sack off the shard, go http://www.vertigo42.co.uk/.

Depends entirely upon what you're interested in surely? I'd go check out Smithfields/Columbia Road, but I enjoy shooting street so it would differ for other people!

^^ Dont like that at all sorry. Way too much saturation imo. Gonna go shoot it on large format so I can sort the verticals out as its horrendous atm.

Come play large format. f64 ftw.

Hey ;) You can take me for a ride in your Aston etc etc. 45 degrees to camera right above at 45 degree angle with grid to cut down on spill on walls etc.

New self portrait. For s***s & giggles.

Surprisingly this thread was less retarded than I anticipated.

Test. by Sam Pegler, on Flickr Softbox + Grid 18 inches from face above right. Just having a giggle checking bits ready for a shoot. //edit - Beard has gone since.

The watermark looks horrendous, I got bored of trying to look at the pictures through the watermark. Use less images and pick stronger ones is all the input I've really got to give.

British Journal of Photography (http://www.bjp-online.com/) is the only one thats worth looking at imo. The others just talk about gear, which tbh you can get better advice on online.

I gave up looking when I saw watermarks on all the images. I mean, come on... They're like 600px web images.

Post some pictures up of street at 200+mm on a crop, im intrigued. Shot at ~40mm from 1m away tops; Brick Lane by Sam Pegler, on Flickr

Shooting street at 400mm equivalent? Jesus, is she trying to shoot voyeur street or something? There'll be no connection, the images will be totally flat and lack any depth? If you're shooting traditional street you'll want to be between 24 and 85mm to have any kind of connection. 35mm on a crop...

You just have to not give a flying f**k and be willing to take s**t for what you're doing.

At least you've got qualifications. I've got skills and experience but nothing to prove it. f**king useless...

Can be literally anything you want. Ish.

Oh f**k doing it that way. You'll want to use DNS of some kind then, http://www.simpledns.com/ works well. So does the inbuilt versions in Server 2008/2012. You'll want to set it to resolve a set list of addresses internally then chuck the rest out to google's or some other DNS servers.

Well that's quite a statement.

CNAME records forward to another domain name. You'll want to add an A record. How many computers are going to be accessing this? As it might just be easier if its a couple to go around and edit the hosts file.

Eh? So what are you running the site on?

As above. Sounds like you want a DNS server that just resolves your search 'site' to 0.1?

http://www.fusionticket.org/ With lots of mods.

goscomb.net - Better have deep pockets.

99.9% sure I just spoke to you on livechat kev.

Might as well post this here...

Aww shucks. Lost track of time and didnt submit anything. 13 misses the point of the subject somewhat, but that's just my opinion.

6, 9 & 10 lack a subject. Rest are pretty decent. Was this last night? I froze walking from Blackfriars to Southwark, screw walking all along Southbank to Tower Bridge!

Ha. You're all paupers.

Jesus christ. Its a digital signal, it either works or it doesn't. There is no difference in image quality. Analogue was almost infinitely variable, therefore cable quality effected image. Did you use a payday loan to pay for them?