should be a sticky tbh, pisses me reet off lol
Well since we're on dietry terminolgy, the MK1 172 were lighter than the full fat 172's so should be termed 172 lite or diet 172.!
LolI'd be more concerned about having just bought a Salmon Clio.
LolI'd be more concerned about having just bought a Salmon Clio.
Well since we're on dietry terminolgy, the MK1 172 were lighter than the full fat 172's so should be termed 172 lite or diet 172.!
PMSL someone whos not read the thread...
ph 172 covers the fact it's a ph1 so why does it need to be called the lite?
should be a sticky tbh, pisses me reet off lol
PMSL someone whos not read the thread...
ph 172 covers the fact it's a ph1 so why does it need to be called the lite?
A "ph 172" doesn't cover squat!! besides I did say ".....since we're on dietry terminolgy,".....:rasp:
PMSL someone whos not read the thread...
ph 172 covers the fact it's a ph1 so why does it need to be called the lite?
A "ph 172" doesn't cover squat!! besides I did say ".....since we're on dietry terminolgy,".....:rasp:
A "ph 172" doesn't cover squat!! besides I did say ".....since we're on dietry terminolgy,".....:rasp:
Agreed, seeing as a 172 cup is still a ph2 172...
Full fat is a made up term that helps people describe things.
If it helps you describe your 172, use it.
Agreed, seeing as a 172 cup is still a ph2 172...
Full fat is a made up term that helps people describe things.
If it helps you describe your 172, use it.
Oh also "FF" didn't exist till the 182 come out with it's cup packs I.E Fully loaded, full fat etc
Red is a describing term, but you wouldn't call a blue car a red car.