Danith
ClioSport Club Member
GTi 7.5 pp/Mx5 nd2
OK - I await all the 'don't be a fanny' comments and 'its 50/50' or 'my mate's has been on 3246236 bhp with no issues' :smile: - I'm not a gambling man, I don't do 50/50, but yes, I am a fanny.
So my Megane R26 is currently on ktec turbo back with sports cat, 630cc injectors, ramair open cone, pro perfekt recirc and 60mm intercooler. It made 276bhp 301 (capped) lb/ft at EFi.
After now reading up on numerous megs now failing on blown engines recently (mainly due to cyl 1 fuel starvation causing ringland failure, rather than bent rods due to torque), I've decided I don't want to be driving around in a ticking time bomb as I really don't need the expense or hassle for a few extra bhp/lbft, so I'm going back for a detune, it's not like I need all that power - think it wasn't far off being perfectly balanced after the sports cat but hey ho - it definitely needs mapping to suit the bolt ons to be safe and have the emissions light for SMF mapped out.
So would like to know regarding leaving the 630s in - although RS tuning did recently publicise that oem injectors are at almost 100% duty even on a standard map (plus oem injectors are about as reliable as Conservative's NHS promises), so 630s may be better to reduce the risk of fuel starvation - however, do they put more stress on the fuel system? Really it all sounds down to a poor fuel rail with no return - but then how does mapping increase the instances of engine failure if it's down to a crap rail!?
So my Megane R26 is currently on ktec turbo back with sports cat, 630cc injectors, ramair open cone, pro perfekt recirc and 60mm intercooler. It made 276bhp 301 (capped) lb/ft at EFi.
After now reading up on numerous megs now failing on blown engines recently (mainly due to cyl 1 fuel starvation causing ringland failure, rather than bent rods due to torque), I've decided I don't want to be driving around in a ticking time bomb as I really don't need the expense or hassle for a few extra bhp/lbft, so I'm going back for a detune, it's not like I need all that power - think it wasn't far off being perfectly balanced after the sports cat but hey ho - it definitely needs mapping to suit the bolt ons to be safe and have the emissions light for SMF mapped out.
So would like to know regarding leaving the 630s in - although RS tuning did recently publicise that oem injectors are at almost 100% duty even on a standard map (plus oem injectors are about as reliable as Conservative's NHS promises), so 630s may be better to reduce the risk of fuel starvation - however, do they put more stress on the fuel system? Really it all sounds down to a poor fuel rail with no return - but then how does mapping increase the instances of engine failure if it's down to a crap rail!?
Last edited: