He only seems to post when the word Williams is mentioned.This topic seems to have brought the RustyArch crew over with their wing mirror spiders so a fight can't be far off.
Maybe i'm too noob to know his ways.
He only seems to post when the word Williams is mentioned.This topic seems to have brought the RustyArch crew over with their wing mirror spiders so a fight can't be far off.
Lol I never mentioned the Puma. I ment the 205 and Williams. I like the Puma look although it's got a bit of a *girls car* image due to most being driven by women and old ladies. If I didn't always see women driving it, then I would've actually bought one as a second car instead of my Polo as I like Fords and I hear they're good handlers. Anyway I hope there's no more talk about 205s, Williams or Pumas in this thread now.
He only seems to post when the word Williams is mentioned.
Maybe i'm too noob to know his ways.
think you mitev missed this....lol
Rolf!By low 15, do you mean 20?
Iv changed my mind too.. It had to be the Ph1, clable throttle no delay in throttle response , slightly lighter and much meaner looking front end :rasp:
Phew, glad that's over!
So who thinks electronic throttle is s**t?
Figures do mean something when a Clio Williams is quicker to 100mph than a Clio V6.
Evo issue 146 sorts this out, the best of the Sport Clios in a shoot out. Williams,172,Trophy,V6 an 200. Note there are no 197s in the line up or mention of them all the way through, Wonder why.....cough cough.....
Any how the Trophy and Williams came out trumps.
probably closer to low 15s dependant on driver amount of fuel etc....but yes.
Can anyone else substantiate this claim that a standard Williams sticks with a Clio V6 up to 110mph?
I'm not normally one for racing or getting caught up in the numbers, but this is intriguing.