Whilst looking at cars online i thiught i'd go onto Parkers Car Guide and What Car etc to check a few prices.
I checked my 172 and a Cup Model at the same time which were both the same year (2002).
Although it quotes with an average mileage of 80,000 which mine is no where near yet .
I found that the guid price 172 Cup is worth less than a Full Fat 172, and yet everyone expects to get so much more for there Cups.
How come the FF is worth more ?
Is it due to the extras such as Climate Control Xenons etc etc
http://www.parkers.co.uk/cars/used-prices/Valuation.aspx?deriv=21329&plate=69#amount=4000
http://www.parkers.co.uk/cars/used-prices/Valuation.aspx?deriv=23590&plate=69#amount=4000&years=3
I know alot of these websites and car guides should be taken with a pinch of salt as i guess your cars only worth what someones willling to pay for it but i guess there must be some truth in the way they get there prices.
Open to comments and Criticisms :approve:
I checked my 172 and a Cup Model at the same time which were both the same year (2002).
Although it quotes with an average mileage of 80,000 which mine is no where near yet .
I found that the guid price 172 Cup is worth less than a Full Fat 172, and yet everyone expects to get so much more for there Cups.
How come the FF is worth more ?
Is it due to the extras such as Climate Control Xenons etc etc
http://www.parkers.co.uk/cars/used-prices/Valuation.aspx?deriv=21329&plate=69#amount=4000
http://www.parkers.co.uk/cars/used-prices/Valuation.aspx?deriv=23590&plate=69#amount=4000&years=3
I know alot of these websites and car guides should be taken with a pinch of salt as i guess your cars only worth what someones willling to pay for it but i guess there must be some truth in the way they get there prices.
Open to comments and Criticisms :approve: