Dr HMS Derv Destroyer
ClioSport Club Member
MK1DCi/vivaro/REN’11
IMO yes he can get the payment back as they haven't delivered.
Could use a 1.8 crank but I would need to remake my pistons and rods
How do you know it will be better?![]()
Quarter inch or something like that?I already changed the crank, rods and pistons a fair bit![]()
sodemo REDUCE the height of the block significantly but use massivley longer rods![]()
i only had a quick 10min play, but the rods are at least 30-40mm longer, the throw on the crank is tiny, with the big end diameter being less than half of OE
I think my crank is 89mm but can't rememebr what we actually came to now as its that long ago!, i moved the pin up the piston and had the longest rod possible, the oil rings are in the pin area.
I wish I knew what any of this meant.
Instead, I'll just wait for the pictures!
9000+ when i go dry sump, maybe 10000
Proper epic.
Ironically would make a far better N/A engine than the pure one that is trendy on here at the moment with all the high revving parts you have!
and yet CS will no doubt dismiss its development as "oh just another turbo motor" lol
Not me serious epicness going on here even tho most of it is going over my head
It's built to flow 300hp without a turbo and higher comp pistons. It would be interesting to see what it could make with no boost tbh. Hmmmm....
Always the best way to build a turbo car IMHO, build it like its an N/A to get it as efficient as possible first then add a massive blower after.
I'm with that to a certain extent, but to build for high hp NA you need very low friction and very high RPM, so you end up with very long duration cams and very high lift to get the airflow. Whereas with a big turbo setup you are all about huge torgue and massive bottom end strength with extra cooling being required. To be able to cope with the boost levels you would be running lower CR pistons. So getting some good flow and having a good solid base engine is all good, but the engines will be quite different internally.
MC