imprezaworks
ClioSport Club Member
Mk5 Golf GTI :)
ClioSport.net
Register a free account today to become a member!
Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Read more here.
SM inlet turkish rs2 ish one...results so far
- Thread starter bloke
- Start date
ADS_V6
ClioSport Club Member
172 cup clio v6 st
Hi mate sorry very busy today had the silenced pms centre fitted.Much better no drone etc,inlet is very quiet compared to ktecs or fattys induction set up,took me by surprise.Rad is now fixed guy made another bracket for it,inlet is going off for fresh carbon as the grill has marked and dented the front of it :anguished:.Other than that all good hoping too come up after xmas and get it on rolling road at EFI
Thanks for asking anyway Al
Thanks for asking anyway Al
Track 172 Cup
ADS_V6
ClioSport Club Member
172 cup clio v6 st
WTF how,puts the rs2 to shame then
imprezaworks
ClioSport Club Member
Mk5 Golf GTI :)
He's going to busy then
imprezaworks
ClioSport Club Member
Mk5 Golf GTI :)
Shame he doesn't map meganes carl
dann2707
ClioSport Club Member
Who got that? Just from the inlet?
@bloke did yesterday with just the inlet, looking at the graph it's got the exact same torque line as the RS2
Clio 172 2002
I don't get it, coming off from the other thread with the sellers responses ( what a prick ) I thought it's worse than OEM inlet ? or was it because it wasn't mapped ? so now it's mapped and it's magical ?
MG ZR x2, Polo, CTR
pretty much
Cub.
ClioSport Moderator
Have you got the graph?
It's a good top figure, but I'll be interested to see what it does throughout the power curve / rev range.
Clio 172 2002
Well I still don't get it, I dont see how it's so much better than the OEM setup. Maybe some one can tell me what im missing here ? I mean the OEM setup is better in like 90% of the RPM range. Am i missing anything obvious ?
Bmw m635csi,polo.
When i was getting mine mapped at rs paul said he could have probably cracked the 200bhp barrier but at a cost to the lower rev range power delivery/tourqe as i wanted the driveability more than top end figures i told him not to bother. It has transformed the car in my opinion and it pulls really well.
bashracing
ClioSport Club Member
When I saw 201hp I nearly fell of my chair I laughed that hard.
The guy from Turkmenistan is going to tell anyone from here who try's to order one to "go fcuk themselves" and I can't say I blame him.
The guy from Turkmenistan is going to tell anyone from here who try's to order one to "go fcuk themselves" and I can't say I blame him.
NorthloopCup
ClioSport Moderator
Just send the raf in to bomb them too. Easy fix to that one. Lol
It's strange, as the AFR on the vehicle I tested it on, showed it was rich, with a lower duty cycle against a very well matched set of inlets and a KTR induction kit. And then the rs2 showed it was flowing better after 4000rpm against this setup. I was hoping it was going to work as this was all before I was offered the opportunity to be the vendor for he rs2, so was looking for a well flowing inlet against the standard.
However all it shows really, that we already know is that these vehicles differ dramatically from one to the next.
However all it shows really, that we already know is that these vehicles differ dramatically from one to the next.
bashracing
ClioSport Club Member
We're turning into Team America,
Just watch for Dave Cameron doing the International distress signal.
Just watch for Dave Cameron doing the International distress signal.
NorthloopCup
ClioSport Moderator
Love that film as well!! Lol!
On an already strong engine as has already been said. Did 175bhp before any work. Which is quite rare to say the least.
As said though, every engine is different. Many said you'd never do 215bhp on a stock bottom end, but I've achieved that.
Clio 172 2002
So basically all agree SM > RS2 > OEM ? I think more tests are needed.
What I found on Alex's was the rs2 was better up above 4000rpm, the sm was better below. We need 5 cars to do back to back tests on each to get a fair trial on each. But I only had the 1 car, and I was curious as everyone else was which is why I did the test (in my own time as well) and quickly completed a graph with all 3 on to show what I'd seen. Mapping them would have got better results and dynoing them would've been more beneficial, but I didn't have the time to take the car to the dyno and pay for a days dyno hire to have a look.
I can put it on the rolling road if you like Alex, I did say it's atleast 185, but that's all I said. You know I didn't rolling road it, and I did give you the option. Going on the fuel figures I've seen on yours and what others usually do 190+ but I'm not one to say oh yes it's doing 200bhp and it then turn out at 190.
330i. E30 Touring.
Bingo.
Peak power figure means absolutely nothing, IMO.
At this stage, i'd still be going RS2, because the gains and driveability are proven on many vehicles. The solution is almost perfected, no tapping/moving holes, no dodgy packaging from the other side of Timbucktoo, reliable retailer.
All in all for me, what a dyno says figure wise is irrelevant. I've spent a lot of time in RS2'd cars, and they drive how a 1*2 should have out of the box IMO. This new one may prove to be equal or better, but i'm holding judgement until those kind of gains are proven across a whole range of examples.
330i. E30 Touring.
You're the kind of customer i turn down work for on a daily basis. Lol.
ADS_V6
ClioSport Club Member
172 cup clio v6 st
Good reply,not slating rs2 far from it,lovely piece of kit maybe having the bigger runners on mine loses low down torque ?But gains it elsewhere
It gains mid range.
ADS_V6
ClioSport Club Member
172 cup clio v6 st
Funny heh?
Similar threads
