ClioSport.net
Register a free account today to become a member!
Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Read more here.
SM inlet turkish rs2 ish one...results so far
- Thread starter bloke
- Start date
imprezaworks
ClioSport Club Member
Mk5 Golf GTI :)
A great car to have put this on. Made up for you guys on the results Carl
imprezaworks
ClioSport Club Member
Mk5 Golf GTI :)
Handy 
but that was before one had been fitted and mapped.
Track 172 Cup
Hopefully as soon as I get mine fitted and over to Chris for a map we will see what it's like mine is a standard engine so hopefully if it's not far of what @bloke got i will be happy and I guess these will be worth it, I only bought mine as it was fairly cheap and hopefully see what gains are like compared to Bloke's.
Bmw m635csi,polo.
Paul at rs tuning i posted the dyno graphs up earlier on in this thread.
Clio 200
I don't get why I read this so often on a simple NA engine, UNLESS, you are takling about cam timing? (though most people are not).
If the cam timing is staying the same..., then the ignition advance and fueling maps at the top end do not have an optimium that is mutually exlusive from an optimium of what you can map at the bottom end. This is EFi, not carbs!
Also with the mk2 that simply phases either fully in or out of VVT, you still get the choice of the optimium engagement points to cover "both" running speeds, this isn't going to 'give more low end with a sacrafice to top end'. Obviously the mk3 has continous VVT allowing dynamic optimisation of cam timing, point still stands true that you are achieving both the best bottom end AND top end in the same map.
I don't know (or give one) about boost, but I believe with wastegates and pressure bleeding you can do the 'more midrange Vs top end' argument, but not on NA. It would take a physical cam timing change either via changing the LSA or moving both cams etc...
/rant :wink:
Bmw m635csi,polo.
You lost me after UNLESS. I am just quoting what i was told by the mapper. My knowledge on engine tuning is limited hence why i took it to be mapped by a pro. I dont know how and why it works it just does.
Bmw m635csi,polo.
This statement was just my interpretation of what paul told me by the way so technicaly its probably wrong as has been pointed out iam sure he would give you the proper reasoning that he gave me but like i said iam not a tuner......
Clio 200
Yeah I understand that mate, but it's one of those common things I see in print on forums all the time and it doesn't stand up.
Paul will (should) know, so I would infer he was talking about cam timing - but that's why I wanted to point out it's not a mapping thing on an NA car, as it's a misinterpreted statement that then gets even further distributed by the masses.
If I had a pound for everytime I read this incorrectly....lol! To be fair you didn't actually say mapping either so not entirely sure why I got on my soap box this time though, probably because I just got on my soap box on a thread on PH...too many e-numbers today I reckon :wink:
Do you think cams would be a good mod with this inlet or would it make the power shift to make it a bit gutless for a daily driver ?
If you did use some cams would you chose a mild cam like the 197 cams or a bit more sporty 438(?) catcams ?
I'm looking at this inlet and the *belts* are due so whilst it's all apart do I chuck some cams in ?
*going to fit some ARP's and a meg pulley when the belts are done, pulley there just incase I go S/C in the future*
If you did use some cams would you chose a mild cam like the 197 cams or a bit more sporty 438(?) catcams ?
I'm looking at this inlet and the *belts* are due so whilst it's all apart do I chuck some cams in ?
*going to fit some ARP's and a meg pulley when the belts are done, pulley there just incase I go S/C in the future*
have just stuck billet flywheel, 182 exhaust manifold and cams in mine. off to be mapped again on wednesday so will post results.
am sure it would still be fine as a daily. personally am not a big fan of the 197 cams as they are a bit of a 'compromise' especially for the price they are going for now.
have just fitted another one to a phase 2 that's running standard cams, 182 exhaust manifold and epas. that will be off for mapping on thursday so will have results from that one as well.
am sure it would still be fine as a daily. personally am not a big fan of the 197 cams as they are a bit of a 'compromise' especially for the price they are going for now.
have just fitted another one to a phase 2 that's running standard cams, 182 exhaust manifold and epas. that will be off for mapping on thursday so will have results from that one as well.
Sounds like a fun week, can't wait to see how you get on
Is there much difference in between the ph1 and 182 cams you're fitting ?
I've not seen those before, which catcam model are they roughly equivalent to ?
Track 172 Cup
Hopefully get it back and get it on track, fingers and toes crossed for a decent figure on thursday
imprezaworks
ClioSport Club Member
Mk5 Golf GTI :)
Though it was Tomo? 206
imprezaworks
ClioSport Club Member
Mk5 Golf GTI :)
Yeah saw the reg. Flamer flaming
ah, the reg that someone made the plates wrong for:wink:
Similar threads
