the supra looks a bit dated imo, but will be alot quicker, and probably with alot more problems aswell
Hmmn, I would rather have a Japanese car than a French one for reliability.
As for the dated looks? I dont agree with that. Clio's somewhat look like toy car's.
You are indeed right about a Supra being much faster though, 340bhp stock trim, with a few mods (BPU kit) 460Bhp at a cost of £743 from
www.suprastore.com
K-tec do have some interesting stories of their 240bhp Clio not being passed all day on track days, out accelerating, or at least keeping up with 500bhp Skylines. But, I simply can't justify £6000 for a Turbo kit, when I could buy a Supra for that kinda dough, allbeit an auto tranny.
I would love to see a Clio-T with uprated crank, conrods, headwork, cams, lightened and balanced crank, flywheel, low comp pistons, water injection, boost increase, bigger Turbo, and Intercooler, all propperly set up and mapped. Oh, and a Racelogic traction/launch controll unit!
As for Supras not handling, thats not true, they can be made to handle very well, just look at the touge/best motoring guys.
Car quotedRENAULT CLIO RENAULTSPORT 172 16V 2000-2003 1998cc 3 DOOR HATCHBACK Manual PetrolSearch date10/04/2007Protected NCBNoYears NCB4
All prices quoted include insurance premium tax
Company PriceLegal
CoverPay Monthly
(subject to credit policy)FlexiBell
£724.50 optional extra</SPAN>check with insurer
Car quotedTOYOTA SUPRA RZ TWIN TURBO 1993-1999 2997cc COUPE Manual PetrolSearch date31/03/2007Protected NCBNoYears NCB4
All prices quoted include insurance premium tax
Company PriceLegal
CoverPay Monthly
(subject to credit policy)FlexiBell
£531.30 optional extra</SPAN>check with insurer