Well my 182 struggled to keep up with a C2 VTS on the straight. RS are not that quick imo
nope it was my best mate. Standard.
Well my 182 struggled to keep up with a C2 VTS on the straight. RS are not that quick imo
RS would be better if they actually gave the right power
Well, well, well. I finally decided to take on this guys offer. From more or less a rolling start, i was ahead, by quite a bit to. On a second run, from a rolling start, he was ahead by about 2-3 car lenghts. Straight road btw.
Well my 182 struggled to keep up with a C2 VTS on the straight. RS are not that quick imo
Ned!
Mare. You need Nos!
Sounds like you can't drive or your car is busted. There is a reasonable difference in performance between these cars.
Yeah its hard driving in a stright line!
Nos wtf
Stupid little bell
It is for you, by the sounds of it.
C2 VTS, wtf.
Stright?
c**k.
An ATR does go well, not much in it
Why do so many RS owners underestimate the JP/JP4 engine, it packs a punch far higher than its bhp
A RS Clio runnning on 3 cylinders would be a more even match for a C2VTS! Id get your car looked at if you are struggling to keep up with one!
What does that actually mean?
They are the 1.6 16v pug/cit engines
raced my bro several times last week in straight line and the clio 182 was all over it especially in midrange could see petrol vapor coming out his 2 exhaust when he was redlining it lol not alot in it tbh.
A RS Clio runnning on 3 cylinders would be a more even match for a C2VTS! Id get your car looked at if you are struggling to keep up with one!
Another gay man
Yeah, sorry I mean what do you mean by they punch far higher than it's bhp?
I mean that they are not all about figures. The gearbox's are very well suited to the engines and the weight of the car is a huge advantage. Not to mention how fast the engine pick-up is due to the slim valves and exceptionally engineered heads