ClioSport.net

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Read more here.

E36 3.0 ITB Race Build

If you want me to move a load of posts out of here into a new thread, just give me a shout.

That pipe fit is toight!
200.gif
 
Any vids? 👍

Ill probably upload a clip this week 👍
Appreciate the time you took to create that update mate :ROFLMAO:

325bhp at 4psi and 385bhp at 7psi it made.

Stock it did 242hp, esentially the book figure for the engine.
Then as above, here is stock vs 4psi, albeit with 50C, intake air temperature.

1754334517623.jpeg


Since spent the past two weeks putting together a big cooling system for the charge cooler, with two more radiators up front, bigger water capacity, high flow pump to get some more realistic temperatures.
 
You could just post it to both… y’know, for the old school among us that remember your old grey Clio?

This thread is ahead of what I've managed to write up so far anyway.

Handy it can all be dropped out as a complete setup, few niggles resolved and going back together for 2026 💨
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20251220_133150 (1).jpg
    IMG_20251220_133150 (1).jpg
    1.8 MB · Views: 78
  • IMG_20251220_130854.jpg
    IMG_20251220_130854.jpg
    1.9 MB · Views: 83
Ouch, worked out why yet?
Well DET killed it, due to oil ingestion, but also an issue with knock control (which would have prevented it). It's a long story and probably easier to explain at Cadwell in July if you're interested!

Spare engine is built up and ready to go in this weekend 👌

1773441514601.jpeg


1773441541456.jpeg


Before Oulton, I got it on the scales post-turbo to compare the weight to pre-turbo - only added circa 25kg overall.

1773441731996.jpeg


1773441752453.jpeg
 
Done 3x days with the turbo now. These were the most recent two. Been mainly running it on 3psi as its a good match with the E46 (well I keep going past ~6000rpm), with 7-8psi on the button if I want it.





Have made more changes, just two more days left this year, but all seems well at the moment. I've started sorting images out to put a thread together

Just watched these again. It's properly quick!
 
Just watched these again. It's properly quick!
It's a good level on both base (wastegate) and 7-8psi, I've added flex fuel over winter so I can run a blended fuel, but ran out of time to get back to the dyno to tune that before the above. My plan this year was to concentrate on the set up more, as it had been good for 6 days in the back half of 2025 with the turbo.

At Oulton it happend mid afternoon, now I know, the damage was done earlier in the day - I was already bleeding boost into the crankcase (via a cracked piston) on an out lap, this then rose rapidly and blew the cam seal out when the piston finally gave way on cylinder 6

 
Looks brilliant. Is ths M2 standard? Given how mentally quick your Cayman must be on track the M2 is mighty impressive.
The M2 is on Nitrons and CR-S, with a map, approx 600hp - however it was his first time at Cadwell... and being a confidence track he was not pushing it at all. There is still lots of time in the Cayman, its consistent high 1.3x's round there though. It was the first outing on the Garrett and running ethanol, so boost vs target was all over the place, however back to the dyno to sort that next week 👍
 
The M2 is on Nitrons and CR-S, with a map, approx 600hp - however it was his first time at Cadwell... and being a confidence track he was not pushing it at all. There is still lots of time in the Cayman, its consistent high 1.3x's round there though. It was the first outing on the Garrett and running ethanol, so boost vs target was all over the place, however back to the dyno to sort that next week 👍
Yes I noticed the boost target was off, seemed stable though.

What are the red orange and blue markers showing re oil pressure?

1783074853925.webp
 
Yes I noticed the boost target was off, seemed stable though.

What are the red orange and blue markers showing re oil pressure?

View attachment 1793960

Yes it's stable, just the whole 3D base duty cycle table for the solenoid is now off on the Garrett. I was running ~E35 last week, and last time on the dyno tuning ethanol the old turbo wouldn't make more than 5psi on 100% duty cycle (now know it was f*cked).

I don't use closed loop boost control - for good reason, if there is an issue (charge cooler restriction for example, or otherwise), the ECU does not just ramp in more boost, and I know to look for a problem.

Hindsight I should have never used a 3 port solenoid, as on E50 I couldnt keep the gate shut on 100% duty cycle. Reason being I want to keep my lowest setting at ~3psi flat, which is the gate spring (300hp on 99RON, 330hp on E50) as its a good level for low. I've now swapped to a 4 port solenoid now and just going to have an hour next week to set up the duty cycle tables from scratch on petrol and max blend.

Red = Oil pump outlet
Orange = Cylinder head (furtherst point)
Blue = Turbo oil feed inlet (It's regulated at 2.7bar with a TurboSmart OPR)

PS - i find it a bit nuts that a 600bhp can head on on track and a) be driveable and b) not overheat. Shows how much extra cooling capacity BMW included... I guess they have setup for track days in Texas or something.

Yeah they are solid, however temperatures are an issue after a few hard laps even on "stage 1", and they do pull power out. Being so new it will take time for people to develop them properly I guess, at least starting from a road car. You arent running it flat out for 45min like I reguarly do put it that way...

It's quite common on that whole platform to run blended fuels now too on an unlocked ECU. The power isn't really needed for any UK circuit IMO
 
I've always run closed loop boost and once setup have found it to be so much better than open. Boost changing with temperature did my nut in. I guess this would be a good use of the borgwarner turbo speed sensor or looking at a pressure sensor on the outlet of the turbo with some rules to cut boost or something if its gone crazy.
 
I've always run closed loop boost and once setup have found it to be so much better than open. Boost changing with temperature did my nut in. I guess this would be a good use of the borgwarner turbo speed sensor or looking at a pressure sensor on the outlet of the turbo with some rules to cut boost or something if its gone crazy.
I didn't see too much variance in boost on the previous setup, maybe half a psi at most - but it's mostly used in these months and never on the road I guess. The closed loop does work well on ECUMaster - it's something to look at, as my resolution is going to drop with the 4 port, so the gate will be harder to control with the 3D table...

I already log charge cooler inlet (compressor) and outlet with a pair of TMAP sensors, added on bosses for those, to see the delta... normally around 1psi drop across the core at most, so can easily just limit RPM/cut boost duty from there if needed..

1783077848104.webp


1783077930240.webp
 
Impressed theres such little variation, 0.5psi is tight, some setups don't get that close even with closed loop.

My issue was that on open loop you would set something up perfectly on the dyno, then on the road under different conditions (temp/load etc) you would make more boost, enough to hit the over boost threshold, or other times the car would feel unexplainably flat. With closed loop (well setup) power delivery is just consistent.

I do agree with your logic though. A boost leak or collapsed intercooler would mean working the turbo much harder to hit target, thinking on it I would expect there to be a table to limit duty, I would log valve duty over several pulls then set the max duty table to be x% higher, even better if you are already logging pressure near the turbo outlet, imagine with the ECUMaster you can create custom tables or fault conditions to mitigate this?
 
Impressed theres such little variation, 0.5psi is tight, some setups don't get that close even with closed loop.

My issue was that on open loop you would set something up perfectly on the dyno, then on the road under different conditions (temp/load etc) you would make more boost, enough to hit the over boost threshold, or other times the car would feel unexplainably flat. With closed loop (well setup) power delivery is just consistent.

I do agree with your logic though. A boost leak or collapsed intercooler would mean working the turbo much harder to hit target, thinking on it I would expect there to be a table to limit duty, I would log valve duty over several pulls then set the max duty table to be x% higher, even better if you are already logging pressure near the turbo outlet, imagine with the ECUMaster you can create custom tables or fault conditions to mitigate this?
I also guess it depends on the setup, wastegate priority and how well the PID is set up for the solenoid first too... so many variables even down to different ECU vendors. With me using a 60mm gate, it has a massive frontal surface area and is basically straight in the flow of both banks - to make ~3psi base on spring it's actually got ~8-9psi worth of spring stacked in it. Quite stable due to the actual hardware more than anything I think.

What it showed for me was when the previous engine was ingesting oil (from the crankcase/turbo via the charge cooler), I would drift away from boost target as the charge cooler was saturated with liquid oil, once it had been cleared/burnt off, boost would return to target.

On ECUMaster the closed loop boost control has upper and lower hard limits, same as closed loop wideband does etc. So you can never truly run away, just need to have your base duty cycle table somewhere close and give it a small window. You can do custom corrections on boost, and custom functions for any variable (which can then trigger an RPM limit, or whatever else etc).

The issue is the EMU Black is hardware limited now - they developed a full firmware rewrite from scratch beginning in 2024 with all new functionality and memory management, I was involved with the early beta and have only ever ran this car on the latest version. It was released as 'V3' earlier this year, however with lots of new suggestions, changes and even more features added, they are on the edge of the hardware limits for memory in regards to more corrections and custom tables.

Because of this you only have one custom boost 2D correction table for duty cycle, and I use this for a correction based on ethanol content. When on blended fuel (and more ignition timing), I need a percentage more duty cycle on the gate as the RPM increases (above what the base duty cycle is on petrol) to maintain the target boost. Closed loop would correct this, but at peak RPM and boost it wants about 25% more duty cycle on E50 than petrol, which is a massive allowance to let it control. If I were to use closed loop now, it would take that correction into account, and ideally you'd only be trimming a few percent all things considered

I have the overall boost cut set at 0.5psi above my peak and I think i've only hit it once in a year, so that gives an idea how much it varies and is the ultimate protection regardless of whatever it tried to add
 
Back
Top