172 engine and interior in a Valver!

[Waitey]

Look here.

http://www.clio-williams.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=9866&postdays=0&postorder=asc&highlight=moteur+rs+dans+clio+16s&start=40http://www.clio-williams.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=9866&postdays=0&postorder=asc&highlight=moteur+rs+dans+clio+16s&start=40

Hell of alot of work must have gone into this.

 

[derv]

damn, bet it shifts too, dont think that conversion has been done over here yet, good to see it can be done though!

 

[davidol]

how the hell did he get the dash in!!!

 

[seb]

thats well cool... the effort invovled must have been tremendous! thatll shift for sure!

 

[Daz.]

Christ how DID he get that dash in? Id love a mk2 dash in the valver - I like the valver dash of course but its really nicely designed the mk2 dash

 

[Djw John]

The seats must need custom subframes as well surely? Thats one helluva job anyway,, all credit to him for having the balls!

 

[midge]

sleeper

 

[jonnyboy]

so the engine will fit without bonnet mods what are you valver owners waiting for!!

 

[derv]

looks like he had a bit of cutting though to get it in! i tried a translator to see wat they are all saying but it wernt comin out very well. anyone speak french?

 

[Waitey]

Yeah there does look to be abit of cutting involved. Will have to get andy at Gdi to say what he thinks since a 172 engine costs the same as a williams one.

 

[Nafoff]

looks crazy, loving the engine but the interiors horrible, mark 1 anyday

 

[Waitey]

Yeah i like the mk1 interior more. Still swaping a whole interior over is no small feat!

 

[Nafoff]

no i respect him greatly for that, very ambitious

by the way waitey, what tyres is it your running Avon..........

 

[R20 CWH]

defo hats off for that - well done

 

[Jase16v]

Ummm 172 lump in the valver, no theres a thought!

 

[Rodg16v]

The wheels look terrible also

 

[cat171]

thats madness, i bet it would cost a fair few grand though!

 

[bobbobadobob]

wow, thats in not what you call a minor interior mod, i wonder loads of planning or bought the interior and made it fit?

 

[Daz.]

Quote: Originally posted by Waitey on 19 April 2005

Yeah there does look to be abit of cutting involved. Will have to get andy at Gdi to say what he thinks since a 172 engine costs the same as a williams one.

^^^ I like your thinking - low mileage 172 engine would be veeeery nice!

 

[docter fox]

Quote: Originally posted by Freebone on 19 April 2005

by the way waitey, what tyres is it your running Avon ZV3

 

[Waitey]

Quote: Originally posted by docter fox on 20 April 2005

Quote: Originally posted by Freebone on 19 April 2005

by the way waitey, what tyres is it your running Avon ZV3

Im running Avon ZV1S not ZV3s

 

[Waitey]

So this enigne in a mildly stripped valver would make these results:





Power at Flywheel (BHP) :
172

Weight without Driver (KG) :
930

Power to Weight Ratio (BHP Per Ton) :
187.92

0 - 60 (Secs) :
6.00

0 - 100 (Secs) :
15.42

60 - 100 (Secs) :
9.42

Quarter Mile (Secs) :
14.42

Terminal Speed (MPH) :
96.71

Drag Strip Quarter Mile (Secs) :
14.22

Drag Strip Terminal Speed (MPH) :
98.45


mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

 

[Lagerlout]

Yup. Add IK, Chip and zorst......... Va Va f**kin Voom.

 

[docter fox]

check the left rear tyre

(hint: inside opposite where it says 1)



[Edited by docter fox on 20 April 2005 at 5:12pm]

answer on msn or when i see ya later...

 

[cat171]

Quote: Originally posted by Waitey on 20 April 2005

So this enigne in a mildly stripped valver would make these results:





Power at Flywheel (BHP) :
172

Weight without Driver (KG) :
930

Power to Weight Ratio (BHP Per Ton) :
187.92

0 - 60 (Secs) :
6.00

0 - 100 (Secs) :
15.42

60 - 100 (Secs) :
9.42

Quarter Mile (Secs) :
14.42

Terminal Speed (MPH) :
96.71

Drag Strip Quarter Mile (Secs) :
14.22

Drag Strip Terminal Speed (MPH) :
98.45


mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

seriously?
if so thats quick !!!!

 

[derv]

damn when i was at cliospares in wolverhampton a couple of months back he had 3 172 engines lying about the place!

 

[TheJesus]

those figures dont quite seem right... a Willy engine that theoretically makes less power but in the same car is about 14.3-14.6... should be faster than that imo

 

[coolspot007007]

Quote: Originally posted by EvilJohn on 19 April 2005

The seats must need custom subframes as well surely? Thats one helluva job anyway,, all credit to him for having the balls!



nope, only need to drill a hole in the floor and a minor bit of tinkering with the subframe to get em in. They are very high though. As for the rears, erm still havent got round to them yet (top half anyway)

 

[Waitey]

Quote: Originally posted by TheJesus on 20 April 2005

those figures dont quite seem right... a Willy engine that theoretically makes less power but in the same car is about 14.3-14.6... should be faster than that imo

Martins banana runs around 14.3 and its a tuned willy lump with around 170bhp. Those figures i posted up are only theoretical anyway.

 

[Dan_mk1]

Quote: Originally posted by Waitey on 20 April 2005
Quote: Originally posted by TheJesus on 20 April 2005those figures dont quite seem right... a Willy engine that theoretically makes less power but in the same car is about 14.3-14.6... should be faster than that imo[/QUOTE]
Martins banana runs around 14.1 and its a tuned willy lump with around 178bhp. Those figures i posted up are only theoretical anyway.





And getting a valver down to 930 is hardly mild, mine came in at 950 with no spare or rear seats. Wouldnt a 172 engine weigh more too?

 

[Waitey]

Probally dan i dont know how much they wiegh but im sure someone on here does.

As for mild it depends of what you class mild as. Martins banana is still in the mild catagory due to having a passenger seat lol

 

[Dan Page]

Quote: Originally posted by lagerlout1 on 20 April 2005

Yup. Add IK, Chip and zorst......... Va Va f**kin Voom.

lmfao!...

bet it is well rapid though, deffo one off sleeper!